Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17103195›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2007

Mucosal injury from targeted anti-cancer therapy.

Dorothy M K Keefe, Rachel J Gibson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Risk of oral and gastrointestinal mucosal injury among patients receiving selected targeted agents: a meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Management of oral and gastrointestinal mucositis: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2011
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Emerging evidence on the pathobiology of mucositis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Review
  11. Emerging evidence on the pathobiology of mucositis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dorothy M K KeefeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital and Discipline of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia. dorothy.keefe@health.sa.gov.au
Rachel J Gibson
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increased use of so-called targeted anti-cancer therapies, there has been a change in toxicities that patients are experiencing. As most targeted therapies are given in conjunction with more traditional chemotherapeutic agents, toxicities of these combination therapies are also evolving. Whilst we increasingly understand the mechanisms underlying the toxicities of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the addition of targeted treatments requires a new understanding of both toxicity and interacting mechanisms.

aimsThe aims of this review (which formed the basis of an invited plenary lecture at the 2006 Annual conference of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer) were to define targeted anti-cancer therapy, to describe its known impact on the mucosa, either alone, or in combination with chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy, and finally to provide an outline for future directions in research into mucosal injury from targeted anti-cancer therapies. METHODOLOGY: Two separate literature reviews were conducted. The combined reviews produced 700 papers of which approximately 70 were included in the review.

resultsAs with mucosal injury (or mucositis) in general, the studies are hampered by a lack of mucosal injury as primary endpoint, and the variable definitions and levels of reporting. The depth to which mucosal injury was studied was also inadequate. However, it is clear that the key to understanding toxicity is to understand the mechanism of action of the drug, from which it should be possible to predict the toxicities that will occur.

conclusionsWith the increasing use of targeted anti-cancer therapies, mucosal injury, particularly in its manifestations of diarrhoea, and mouth ulcers, is becoming even more prominent. More publications of basic and clinical research in this area is required.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsContraindicationsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMucositisAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID17103195
OpenAlexW2058360220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.