Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17102807›Full record

ReviewMolecular systems biology2006

Metabolic networks in motion: 13C-based flux analysis.

Uwe Sauer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular systems biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 261 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
261citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

261 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A simple, anesthesia-free infusion technique forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Sperm meet the elevated energy demands to attain fertilization competence by increasing flux through aldolase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Non-canonical plant metabolism.Nature plants · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Use ofBiomolecules · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Tracing the path of disruption:CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

201 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Uwe SauerInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland. sauer@ethz.ch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many properties of complex networks cannot be understood from monitoring the components--not even when comprehensively monitoring all protein or metabolite concentrations--unless such information is connected and integrated through mathematical models. The reason is that static component concentrations, albeit extremely informative, do not contain functional information per se. The functional behavior of a network emerges only through the nonlinear gene, protein, and metabolite interactions across multiple metabolic and regulatory layers. I argue here that intracellular reaction rates are the functional end points of these interactions in metabolic networks, hence are highly relevant for systems biology. Methods for experimental determination of metabolic fluxes differ fundamentally from component concentration measurements; that is, intracellular reaction rates cannot be detected directly, but must be estimated through computer model-based interpretation of stable isotope patterns in products of metabolism.

Indexed as

Radioactive TracersAnimalsBiomedical EngineeringBiotechnologyCarbon RadioisotopesComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularHumansIntracellular FluidMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalRadionuclide ImagingSignal TransductionCarbon RadioisotopesRadioactive Tracers

Identifiers

PMID17102807
PMCPMC1682028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.