Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17101736›Full record

ArticleThorax2007

Chronic cough: how do cough reflex sensitivity and subjective assessments correlate with objective cough counts during ambulatory monitoring?

Samantha Clare Decalmer, Deborah Webster, Angela Alice Kelsall, Kevin McGuinness, Ashley Arthur Woodcock, Jaclyn Ann Smith

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05042063 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Acoustic Cough Monitoring for the Management of Patients With Known Respiratory Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorClinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de NavarraRan2021 to 2022Enrolled616ConditionsCough, COPD, GERD, AsthmaArmsHyfe Cough Tracker, Hyfe Air
NCT05723159 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Validation of the Hyfe Cough Monitoring System

TypeobservationalSponsorHyfe IncRan2023 to 2023Enrolled21ConditionsCoughArmsClinical Validation of the Hyfe Cough Monitoring System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chronic cough: more than just a persistent cough: a systematic literature review to understand the impact of chronic cough on quality of life.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of gefapixant for chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Speech and language therapy for management of chronic cough.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha Clare DecalmerNorth West Lung Research Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UK. samdecalmer@hotmail.com
Deborah Webster
Angela Alice Kelsall
Kevin McGuinness
Ashley Arthur Woodcock
Jaclyn Ann Smith
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCough reflex sensitivity, subjective estimates of cough frequency and cough-related quality of life have been used to assess cough and monitor treatment responses. The relationships between these measures and objective cough monitoring remain unclear and the usefulness of subjective assessments remains questionable. SUBJECTS: 62 patients with chronic cough (39 women) were studied. Mean age of patients was 54.9 (SD 12.2) years, with a median duration of cough of 5.5 (range 1-30) years.

methodsCough reflex sensitivity testing (C5; citric acid) was performed in all patients before fully ambulatory day-time and night-time cough recordings. Patients scored the frequency and severity of their cough (Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and 0-5 score) for each recording period and completed a cough-related quality-of-life questionnaire, Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Ambulatory cough recordings were manually counted and reported in terms of cough seconds per hour (cs/h). Cough rates were log(10) transformed for analysis.

resultsThe median time spent coughing was 11.36 (range 1.06-46) cs/h with median day rates of 15.59 (range 2-74.8) cs/h and median night rates of 2.94 (range 0-26.67) cs/h. An inverse relationship was seen between day cough rates and log(10) C5 (r = -0.452, p< or =0.001). Subjective cough scores and visual analogue scales were only moderately associated with objective time spent coughing, with night-time being scores more strongly associated than day-time scores. The strongest correlation with objective cough frequency was cough-related quality of life (LCQ), (r = -0.622, p< or =0.001), mediated through the psychological domain.

conclusionsSubjective measures of cough and cough reflex sensitivity are only moderately related to objective time spent coughing, and hence cannot be used as surrogate markers for objective cough-frequency measurements. Cough-related quality of life (LCQ) is most strongly related to objectively counted cough, and may be a useful adjunct to objective measures in the assessment of cough.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseCoughFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryQuality of LifeReflex

Identifiers

PMID17101736
PMCPMC2092471
OpenAlexW2146824017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.