Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17101057›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2006

Molecular patterns of sex determination in the animal kingdom: a comparative study of the biology of reproduction.

Panagiota Manolakou, Giagkos Lavranos, Roxani Angelopoulou

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex Determination in Sponges.Molecular reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  2. Molecular Characterization and Expression ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. On the evolution of variation in sexual reproduction through the prism of eukaryotic microbes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Epigenetic Molecular Mechanisms in Insects.Neotropical entomology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Population Effects of Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles inACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Zebrafish sex: a complicated affair.Briefings in functional genomics · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sex determination strategies in 2012: towards a common regulatory model?Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Panagiota ManolakouExperimental Embryology Unit, Department of Histology and Embryology, Medical School, Athens University, Greece. panmanolacou@yahoo.gr
Giagkos Lavranos
Roxani Angelopoulou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining sexual fate is an integral part of reproduction, used as a means to enrich the genome. A variety of such regulatory mechanisms have been described so far and some of the more extensively studied ones are being discussed. For the insect order of Hymenoptera, the choice lies between uniparental haploid males and biparental diploid females, originating from unfertilized and fertilized eggs accordingly. This mechanism is also known as single-locus complementary sex determination (slCSD). On the other hand, for Dipterans and Drosophila melanogaster, sex is determined by the ratio of X chromosomes to autosomes and the sex switching gene, sxl. Another model organism whose sex depends on the X:A ratio, Caenorhabditis elegans, has furthermore to provide for the brief period of spermatogenesis in hermaphrodites (XX) without the benefit of the "male" genes of the sex determination pathway. Many reptiles have no discernible sex determining genes. Their sexual fate is determined by the temperature of the environment during the thermosensitive period (TSP) of incubation, which regulates aromatase activity. Variable patterns of sex determination apply in fish and amphibians. In birds, while sex chromosomes do exist, females are the heterogametic (ZW) and males the homogametic sex (ZZ). However, we have yet to decipher which of the two (Z or W) is responsible for the choice between males and females. In mammals, sex determination is based on the presence of two identical (XX) or distinct (XY) gonosomes. This is believed to be the result of a lengthy evolutionary process, emerging from a common ancestral autosomal pair. Indeed, X and Y present different levels of homology in various mammals, supporting the argument of a gradual structural differentiation starting around the SRY region. The latter initiates a gene cascade that results in the formation of a male. Regulation of sex steroid production is also a major result of these genetic interactions. Similar observations have been described not only in mammals, but also in other vertebrates, emphasizing the need for further study of both normal hormonal regulators of sexual phenotype and patterns of epigenetic/environmental disruption.

Indexed as

Sex Determination ProcessesAmphibiansAnimalsBirdsCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophila melanogasterEpigenesis, GeneticFishesHymenopteraMammalsReptiles

Identifiers

PMID17101057
PMCPMC1660543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.