Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17099229›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2007

Pseudogene.org: a comprehensive database and comparison platform for pseudogene annotation.

John E Karro, Yangpan Yan, Deyou Zheng, Zhaolei Zhang, Nicholas Carriero, Philip Cayting, Paul Harrrison, Mark Gerstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lack of CpG islands in human unitary pseudogenes and its implication.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. SinEx DB 2.0 update 2020: database for eukaryotic single-exon coding sequences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  13. Computational Methods for Pseudogene Annotation Based on Sequence Homology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  14. Pseudogenes: Four Decades of Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Strategies to Study the Functions of Pseudogenes in Mouse Models of Cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John E KarroCenter for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, 506B Wartik, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. jkarro@acm.org
Yangpan Yan
Deyou Zheng
Zhaolei Zhang
Nicholas Carriero
Philip Cayting
Paul Harrrison
Mark Gerstein

Funding

Human Genome Array: Technology for Functional AnalysisP50HG002357 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, MICHAEL P. · 2001 to 2010
$31.9M
Creating software tools for whole genome comparisonK01HG003315 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI KARRO, JOHN · 2004 to 2006
$310k
NHGRI NIH HHS 5K01HG003315NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG003315NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG002357NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG02357-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pseudogene.org knowledgebase serves as a comprehensive repository for pseudogene annotation. The definition of a pseudogene varies within the literature, resulting in significantly different approaches to the problem of identification. Consequently, it is difficult to maintain a consistent collection of pseudogenes in detail necessary for their effective use. Our database is designed to address this issue. It integrates a variety of heterogeneous resources and supports a subset structure that highlights specific groups of pseudogenes that are of interest to the research community. Tools are provided for the comparison of sets and the creation of layered set unions, enabling researchers to derive a current 'consensus' set of pseudogenes. Additional features include versatile search, the capacity for robust interaction with other databases, the ability to reconstruct older versions of the database (accounting for changing genome builds) and an underlying object-oriented interface designed for researchers with a minimal knowledge of programming. At the present time, the database contains more than 100,000 pseudogenes spanning 64 prokaryote and 11 eukaryote genomes, including a collection of human annotations compiled from 16 sources.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticPseudogenesHumansInternetSoftwareUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID17099229
PMCPMC1669708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.