Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17096638›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2006

A history of drug advertising: the evolving roles of consumers and consumer protection.

Julie Donohue

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The commercialisation of insulin.Anaesthesia and intensive care · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of direct-to-consumer drug advertising during the Super Bowl on drug utilization.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Pediatric melanoma-The whole (conflicts of interest) story.International journal of women's dermatology · 2019
    Review
  15. The Challenges of Pediatric Drug Development.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2019
    Review
  16. Questionable Industry-Sponsored Postneonatal Pediatric Studies in Slovenia.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2019
    Article
  17. Are Regulatory Age Limits in Pediatric Melanoma Justified?Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Pediatric Melanoma and Drug Development.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Julie DonohueUniversity of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, 130 DeSoto Street, Crabtree Hall A613, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. jdonohue@pitt.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs in the United States is controversial. Underlying the debate are disagreements over the role of consumers in medical decision making, the appropriateness of consumers engaging in self-diagnosis, and the ethics of an industry promoting potentially dangerous drugs. Drug advertising and federal policy governing drug advertising have both responded to and reinforced changes in the consumer's role in health care and in the doctor-patient relationship over time. This article discusses the history of DTCA in the context of social movements to secure rights for health care patients and consumers, the modern trend toward consumer-oriented medicine, and the implications of DTCA and consumer-oriented medicine for contemporary health policy debates about improving the health care system.

Indexed as

Consumer Product SafetyPatient ParticipationAdvertisingDecision MakingDrug IndustryFederal GovernmentGovernment RegulationHealth PolicyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsProfessional AutonomySelf CareUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID17096638
PMCPMC2690298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.