Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17096598›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2006

Selection for unequal densities of sigma70 promoter-like signals in different regions of large bacterial genomes.

Araceli M Huerta, M Pilar Francino, Enrique Morett, Julio Collado-Vides

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Synthetic gene-regulatory networks in the opportunistic human pathogenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Spatial organization of RNA polymerase and its relationship with transcription inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Araceli M HuertaCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, México. amhuerta@ccg.unam.mx
M Pilar Francino
Enrique Morett
Julio Collado-Vides
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

Gene Regulation E.coli Database Intergrated EnvironmentR01GM062205 · NIGMS · UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTONOMA DE MEXICO · PI COLLADO-VIDES, JULIO · 2001 to 2003
$375k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM62205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolutionary processes operating in the DNA regions that participate in the regulation of gene expression are poorly understood. In Escherichia coli, we have established a sequence pattern that distinguishes regulatory from nonregulatory regions. The density of promoter-like sequences, that could be recognizable by RNA polymerase and may function as potential promoters, is high within regulatory regions, in contrast to coding regions and regions located between convergently transcribed genes. Moreover, functional promoter sites identified experimentally are often found in the subregions of highest density of promoter-like signals, even when individual sites with higher binding affinity for RNA polymerase exist elsewhere within the regulatory region. In order to see the generality of this pattern, we have analyzed 43 additional genomes belonging to most established bacterial phyla. Differential densities between regulatory and nonregulatory regions are detectable in most of the analyzed genomes, with the exception of those that have evolved toward extreme genome reduction. Thus, presence of this pattern follows that of genes and other genomic features that require weak selection to be effective in order to persist. On this basis, we suggest that the loss of differential densities in the reduced genomes of host-restricted pathogens and symbionts is an outcome of the process of genome degradation resulting from the decreased efficiency of purifying selection in highly structured small populations. This implies that the differential distribution of promoter-like signals between regulatory and nonregulatory regions detected in large bacterial genomes confers a significant, although small, fitness advantage. This study paves the way for further identification of the specific types of selective constraints that affect the organization of regulatory regions and the overall distribution of promoter-like signals through more detailed comparative analyses among closely related bacterial genomes.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAmino Acid MotifsBase SequenceConsensus SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialMolecular Sequence DataMycobacterium lepraeMycobacterium tuberculosisPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence AlignmentSigma FactorDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRNA polymerase sigma 70Sigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID17096598
PMCPMC1635534
OpenAlexW2144653683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.