ReviewDer Anaesthesist2007
[Prerequisites of a functional haemostasis. What must be considered at the scene of an accident, in the emergency room and during an operation?].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Approaches to pre-hospital bleeding management : Current overview on civilian emergency medicine].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
- [Hemoglobin-oriented and coagulation factor-based algorithm : Effect on transfusion needs and standardized mortality rate in massively transfused trauma patients].Der Anaesthesist · 2015Review
- [Treatment of polytrauma in the intensive care unit].Der Anaesthesist · 2010Review
- [Coagulation management in multiple trauma].Der Unfallchirurg · 2009Review
- [Coagulation management in the treatment of multiple trauma].Der Anaesthesist · 2009Review
- Alcohol-positive multiple trauma patients with and without blood transfusion: an outcome analysis.Journal of trauma management & outcomes · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A coagulopathy is an independent predictor of perioperative mortality. Therefore, maintenance of a functional coagulation system is an essential precondition to reduce morbidity and mortality in the perioperative setting. Sound coagulability also depends on prerequisites such as body temperature, acid-base balance, plasma calcium concentration and haematocrit. Severe trauma or perioperative bleeding can gravely influence these factors and boost the blood loss. Common global tests of coagulation are not helpful in this setting because they are conducted on plasma with a normalised temperature of 37 degrees C, an excess of calcium and a stabile acid-base balance. Hence, knowledge of the effects of altered prerequisites is a premise to avoid a possibly lethal coagulopathy. According to the current literature, an increased risk for clinically significant coagulopathy exists with a body temperature <or=34 degrees C, an acidosis <or=7.15, ionised calcium under 0.9 mmol/l or a haematocrit under 30-35%. A combination of these factors deteriorates the coagulopathy and hypothermia in addition to acidosis is especially harmful. Prevention of derangement of these factors should start as early as possible, i.e. in trauma patients at the scene of the accident and should be continued in the operating room.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.