Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17095702›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2006

Direct measurement of the full, sequence-dependent folding landscape of a nucleic acid.

Michael T Woodside, Peter C Anthony, William M Behnke-Parks, Kevan Larizadeh, Daniel Herschlag, Steven M Block

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 167 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Stick-slip unfolding favors self-association of expandedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Quantifying a light-induced energetic change in bacteriorhodopsin by force spectroscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Disruption of energetic and dynamic base pairing cooperativity in DNA duplexes by an abasic site.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael T WoodsideNational Institute for Nanotechnology, National Research Council of Canada, Edmonton AB, Canada, T6G 2M9.
Peter C Anthony
William M Behnke-Parks
Kevan Larizadeh
Daniel Herschlag
Steven M Block

Funding

Time-resolved small angle X-ray scatteringP01GM066275 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HERSCHLAG, DANIEL · 2003 to 2017
$17.8M
TRANSCRIPTION STUDIED AT THE MOLECULAR LEVELR01GM057035 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLOCK, STEVEN M · 1997 to 2009
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01-GM066275NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acid hairpins provide a powerful model system for understanding macromolecular folding, with free-energy landscapes that can be readily manipulated by changing the hairpin sequence. The full shapes of energy landscapes for the reversible folding of DNA hairpins under controlled loads exerted by an optical force clamp were obtained by deconvolution from high-resolution, single-molecule trajectories. The locations and heights of the energy barriers for hairpin folding could be tuned by adjusting the number and location of G:C base pairs, and the presence and position of folding intermediates were controlled by introducing single-nucleotide mismatches.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBase PairingBase Pair MismatchDNAModels, ChemicalThermodynamicsDNA

Identifiers

PMID17095702
PMCPMC2656380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.