Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17095545›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2007

Impact of service changes on neonatal transfer patterns over 10 years.

Jonathan Cusack, David Field, Bradley Manktelow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Neonatal transfers--a thin layer of glue to keep the service network together?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan CusackNeonatal Unit, Kensington Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Road, Leicester, UK. jonathan.cusack@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
David Field
Bradley Manktelow

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany changes have been made to the staffing and organisation of neonatal care in the UK in the past 10 years. This study assessed the extent to which these changes had affected the transfer of babies between different parts of the service.

methodsData from the Trent Neonatal Survey, an ongoing study of neonatal intensive care activity in the former Trent Health Region of the UK, were used to evaluate neonatal inter-hospital transfers over a 10-year period, from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2004. The number of transfers and the types of transfer were analysed and trends in gestation and disease severity over the study period were assessed. Rates of "inappropriate transfer" were also identified.

results8105 babies were transferred over the period; 2294 babies underwent urgent postnatal transfer and this equates to approximately two such transfers every three days. The maximum number of journeys by any one baby was eight. Intensive care activity rose during the 10 years but the number of inappropriate transfers remained persistently high.

conclusionsOrganisational changes in neonatal care during the 10-year period have been insufficient to deal with the rising demand, as reflected by the persistently high rate of inappropriate transfers.

Indexed as

EnglandGestational AgeHealth Services MisuseHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalPatient TransferPerinatal CareProfessional PracticeRisk FactorsTransportation of Patients

Identifiers

PMID17095545
PMCPMC2675325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.