ArticleJournal of microbiological methods2007
Evaluation of microbial RNA extractions from Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Article in Journal of microbiological methods, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial Activity of Peptide-Coupled Antisense Peptide Nucleic Acids in Streptococcus pneumoniae.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- An optimized and robust PEG precipitation method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater.The Science of the total environment · 2021Article
- Identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in culture-negative middle ear fluids from children with acute otitis media by combination of multiplex PCR and multi-locus sequencing typing.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanisms that control Streptococcus pneumoniae's ability to colonize the nasopharynx or to invade the middle ear and cause acute otitis media are not understood. Focused study of these mechanisms requires efficient methods for the extraction of microbial RNA from minute clinical samples. Several lysis/extraction methods were tested and compared to determine the optimal conditions for isolating intact total RNA from pneumococcal cells. The sensitivity and efficiency of the extractions were evaluated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Compared to other methods, mechanical homogenization in TRIZOL was the most efficient for releasing microbial RNA, and addition of polyinosinic acid (Poly I) as an RNA carrier increased the assay sensitivity to 10(2) colony forming units when detected by RT-PCR amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA or messenger RNA for penicillin binding protein 2b. Quantitative results were confirmed using a ribonuclease protection assay. Penicillin binding protein 2b was also detected in rat middle ear mucosa recovered 5 weeks after middle ear challenge with S. pneumoniae. This study describes a useful core methodology for use in identifying pneumococcal virulence genes from small titer samples and has promising applications in clinical studies of pneumococcal nasopharyngeal colonization and otitis media pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.