ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2006
Identifying interaction sites in "recalcitrant" proteins: predicted protein and RNA binding sites in rev proteins of HIV-1 and EIAV agree with experimental data.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequence and Functional Variation in the HIV-1 Rev Regulatory Axis.Current HIV research · 2020Article
- Prediction of RNA-binding proteins by voting systems.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011Article
- PRIDB: a Protein-RNA interface database.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Struct-NB: predicting protein-RNA binding sites using structural features.International journal of data mining and bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Striking similarities in diverse telomerase proteins revealed by combining structure prediction and machine learning approaches.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2008Article
- RNABindR: a server for analyzing and predicting RNA-binding sites in proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2007Article
- Prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins from amino acid sequence.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-protein and protein nucleic acid interactions are vitally important for a wide range of biological processes, including regulation of gene expression, protein synthesis, and replication and assembly of many viruses. We have developed machine learning approaches for predicting which amino acids of a protein participate in its interactions with other proteins and/or nucleic acids, using only the protein sequence as input. In this paper, we describe an application of classifiers trained on datasets of well-characterized protein-protein and protein-RNA complexes for which experimental structures are available. We apply these classifiers to the problem of predicting protein and RNA binding sites in the sequence of a clinically important protein for which the structure is not known: the regulatory protein Rev, essential for the replication of HIV-1 and other lentiviruses. We compare our predictions with published biochemical, genetic and partial structural information for HIV-1 and EIAV Rev and with our own published experimental mapping of RNA binding sites in EIAV Rev. The predicted and experimentally determined binding sites are in very good agreement. The ability to predict reliably the residues of a protein that directly contribute to specific binding events--without the requirement for structural information regarding either the protein or complexes in which it participates--can potentially generate new disease intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17094257PMC2553683W2023994926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.