Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17093079›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

Blocking memory reconsolidation reverses memory-associated changes in glutamate receptor expression.

Jacqueline K Rose, Catharine H Rankin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Mechanisms of Reconsolidation-Dependent Memory Updating.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  3. Function and mechanisms of memory destabilization and reconsolidation after retrieval.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reconsolidation and the Dynamic Nature of Memory.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The FMRFamide-Like Peptide Family in Nematodes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2014
    Review
  9. Memory as a new therapeutic target.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2013
    Review
  10. Memory reconsolidation in aversive and appetitive settings.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Learning and reconsolidation implicate different synaptic mechanisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Chemical modulation of memory formation in larval zebrafish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacqueline K RoseDepartment of Psychology and Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 2B5.
Catharine H Rankin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been reported that consolidated memories can return to a labile state when reactivated and undergo a process of re-storage, termed reconsolidation, required for later recall. We investigated memory for a nonassociative learning task (habituation) and found that memory for this task also undergoes reconsolidation after recall. To investigate reconsolidation, we first demonstrated that adult Caenorhabditis elegans are capable of reliable memory 48 h after habituation training (p < 0.05). When heat shock was administered immediately after a reminder, response magnitudes of trained animals matched response levels of untrained animals: the inhibitory effects of heat shock on protein synthesis disrupted memory reconsolidation. Pharmacological blockade of non-NMDA-type glutamate receptors during reminder also eliminated 48 h retention. When expression levels of a specific glutamate receptor subunit (GLR-1) (40% homology to mammalian AMPA-type glutamate receptors) (Hart et al., 1995; Maricq et al., 1995) were measured 48 h after training, there was a significant decrease in trained compared with untrained controls. If trained worms were given a reminder followed immediately by heat shock, the effect of training on GLR-1 levels was reversed. From these studies, we conclude that both the behavioral expression of long-term memory for habituation and a cellular correlate of that memory (the alteration in expression levels of GLR-1) in C. elegans can be altered after retrieval. Furthermore, conditions that impair memory consolidation similarly disrupt memory reconsolidation, suggesting that similar mechanisms are involved.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAssociation LearningBehavior, AnimalCaenorhabditis elegansExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGene Expression RegulationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHabituation, PsychophysiologicHot TemperatureMemoryQuinoxalinesReceptors, GlutamateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFG 9041Green Fluorescent ProteinsQuinoxalinesReceptors, Glutamate

Identifiers

PMID17093079
PMCPMC6674789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.