Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17093016›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

IS1301 fingerprint analysis of Neisseria meningitidis strains belonging to the ET-15 clone.

Johannes Elias, Ulrich Vogel

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Emergence of a newProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johannes EliasInstitute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany. jelias@hygiene.uni-wuerzburg.de
Ulrich Vogel
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningococci of the ET-15 clone frequently cause clusters of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) and are associated with a high case-fatality ratio. Timely typing of strains from outbreaks of IMD caused by this clone is hampered by the low variability of its surface antigens. We present a new Southern blot-based typing method for ET-15 meningococci based on the insertion element IS1301, which was present in all 70 ET-15 strains tested. Fingerprints were stable in vitro over a period of 100 days of cultivation on agar plates. The discriminatory power of IS1301 fingerprinting exceeded that of typing by serogrouping and antigen sequencing of the outer membrane proteins PorA and FetA, as determined by the analysis of 52 epidemiologically unrelated strains. In addition, the method provided conclusive results with regard to the comparison of strains from clusters of IMD. The investigation of insertion sites of IS1301 revealed several new intragenic insertions, among others, into open reading frames homologous to mafB and tspB. A previously described insertion in nadA was present in more than two-thirds of the strains analyzed, suggesting that NadA is probably an unreliable vaccine candidate for the prevention of ET-15 disease.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingDNA Transposable ElementsHumansMeningococcal InfectionsMolecular Sequence DataNeisseria meningitidisPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID17093016
PMCPMC1828961
OpenAlexW1976838124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.