ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2006
Preclinical imaging of mammary intraepithelial neoplasia with positron emission tomography.
Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intratumoral in vivo staging of breast cancer by multi-tracer PET and advanced analysis.NPJ breast cancer · 2022Article
- Motivations for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy as a function of socioeconomic status.BMC women's health · 2017Article
- Neutrophils drive accelerated tumor progression in the collagen-dense mammary tumor microenvironment.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2016Article
- Glucose Uptake and Intracellular pH in a Mouse Model of Ductal Carcinoma In situ (DCIS) Suggests Metabolic Heterogeneity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2016Article
- Monitoring therapy with MEK inhibitor U0126 in a novel Wilms tumor model in Wt1 knockout Igf2 transgenic mice using 18F-FDG PET with dual-contrast enhanced CT and MRI: early metabolic response without inhibition of tumor growth.Molecular imaging and biology · 2013Article
- Establishment of clonal MIN-O transplant lines for molecular imaging via lentiviral transduction & in vitro culture.PloS one · 2012Article
- Choosing a mouse model: experimental biology in context--the utility and limitations of mouse models of breast cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2011Review
- In vivo MRI of early stage mammary cancers and the normal mouse mammary gland.NMR in biomedicine · 2011Article
- Longitudinal investigation of permeability and distribution of macromolecules in mouse malignant transformation using PET.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2011Article
- Positron emission tomography imaging of DMBA/TPA mouse skin multi-step tumorigenesis.Molecular oncology · 2010Article
- Distinct temporospatial expression patterns of glycolysis-related proteins in human hepatocellular carcinoma.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2009Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of the natural history of in situ mammary neoplasia in transgenic mice: a pilot study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2009Article
- Comparison of mouse mammary gland imaging techniques and applications: reflectance confocal microscopy, GFP imaging, and ultrasound.BMC cancer · 2008Article
- Modeling metastatic breast cancer in mice.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small-animal imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) has become a valuable tool for evaluating preclinical models of breast cancer and other diseases. In this review, we examine a number of issues related to preclinical imaging studies with PET, using transgenic models of ductal carcinoma in situ and metastasis as specific examples. We discuss imaging components such as reconstruction, normalization, and extraction of quantitative parameters. We also analyze the effect of longitudinal correlations on cohort size and present some simple statistical techniques for determining cohort sizes that may be helpful in designing preclinical imaging studies. We describe studies that are greatly facilitated by access to non-invasive imaging data including a study involving multiple endpoints and another investigating metastasis. We conclude with a brief survey of emerging approaches in small-animal PET imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17091397What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.