Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17088348›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2007

Differences in Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E growth rate in polarized endometrial and endocervical epithelial cells grown in three-dimensional culture.

Natalia V Guseva, Sophie Dessus-Babus, Cheryl G Moore, Judy D Whittimore, Priscilla B Wyrick

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Repurposing epetraborole to combatAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Better In Vitro Tools for ExploringLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Heliyon · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Organoid technology in female reproductive biomedicine.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020
    Review
  10. Murine Endometrial Organoids to ModelFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A renewed tool kit to exploreF1000Research · 2019
    Review
  13. Development of a NovelFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inhibition of Wnt Signaling Pathways ImpairsFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalia V GusevaDepartment of Microbiology, East Tennessee State University, James H. Quillen College of Medicine, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.
Sophie Dessus-Babus
Cheryl G Moore
Judy D Whittimore
Priscilla B Wyrick
East Tennessee State University · US

Funding

VIRULENCE FACTORS OF CHLAMYDIAER01AI013446 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WYRICK, PRISCILLA B. · 1985 to 2009
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS AI13446NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI013446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro studies of obligate intracellular chlamydia biology and pathogenesis are highly dependent on the use of experimental models and growth conditions that mimic the mucosal architecture and environment these pathogens encounter during natural infections. In this study, the growth of Chlamydia trachomatis genital serovar E was monitored in mouse fibroblast McCoy cells and compared to more relevant host human epithelial endometrium-derived HEC-1B and cervix-derived HeLa cells, seeded and polarized on collagen-coated microcarrier beads, using a three-dimensional culture system. Microscopy analysis of these cell lines prior to infection revealed morphological differences reminiscent of their in vivo architecture. Upon infection, early chlamydial inclusion distribution was uniform in McCoy cells but patchy in both epithelial cell lines. Although no difference in chlamydial attachment to or entry into the two genital epithelial cell lines was noted, active bacterial genome replication and transcription, as well as initial transformation of elementary bodies to reticulate bodies, were detected earlier in HEC-1B than in HeLa cells, suggesting a faster growth, which led to higher progeny counts and titers in HEC-1B cells upon completion of the developmental cycle. Chlamydial development in the less relevant McCoy cells was very similar to that in HeLa cells, although higher progeny counts were obtained. In conclusion, this three-dimensional bead culture system represents an improved model for harvesting large quantities of infectious chlamydia progeny from their more natural polarized epithelial host cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell LineCell PolarityChlamydia trachomatisCytoplasmDNA, BacterialDNA ReplicationEndometriumEpithelial CellsFemaleFibroblastsHeLa CellsHumansInclusion BodiesMiceDNA, BacterialRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID17088348
PMCPMC1828515
OpenAlexW1973963555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.