ArticleHealth research policy and systems2006
Building health research systems to achieve better health.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3Rs principles for biomedical research in Africa: Evidence, challenges, early career researchers' perspectives, and pathways for One Health research governance.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- The Cameroon Health Research and Evidence Database (CAMHRED): tools and methods for local evidence mapping.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Mapping experiences and perspectives of equity in international health collaborations: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- Considering equity in global health collaborations: A qualitative study on experiences of equity.PloS one · 2021Article
- Governance of health research funding institutions: an integrated conceptual framework and actionable functions of governance.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Evaluation of regional project to strengthen national health research systems in four countries in West Africa: lessons learned.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Practical lessons for bringing policy-makers on board in sexual and reproductive health research.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Embedding research in health systems: lessons from complexity theory.Health research policy and systems · 2016Article
- Developing collaborative approaches to international research: Perspectives of new global health researchers.Global public health · 2016Article
- Institutional facilities in national health research systems in sub-Saharan African countries: results of a questionnaire-based survey.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2014Article
- Capacity development in health systems and policy research: a survey of the Canadian context.Health research policy and systems · 2014Article
- Needs assessment in health research projects: a new approach to project management in iran.Iranian journal of public health · 2013Article
- Iranian Health Research Networks and Vision of Iran by 2025: A Case of Virtual Health Network in EMRI.Iranian journal of public health · 2013Article
- Developing a national health research system: participatory approaches to legislative, institutional and networking dimensions in Zambia.Health research policy and systems · 2012Review
- Ophthalmic research priorities and practices in Nigeria: an assessment of the views of nigerian ophthalmologists.Middle East African journal of ophthalmology · 2011Article
- Perceptions of Nigerian medical specialists on research.Journal of public health in Africa · 2011Review
- Developing a conceptual framework for an evaluation system for the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks.Health research policy and systems · 2009Article
- Exploring evidence-policy linkages in health research plans: a case study from six countries.Health research policy and systems · 2008Article
- Why national health research systems matter.Health research policy and systems · 2008Article
- Evidence to action needs research.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health research systems can link knowledge generation with practical concerns to improve health and health equity. Interest in health research, and in how health research systems should best be organised, is moving up the agenda of bodies such as the World Health Organisation. Pioneering health research systems, for example those in Canada and the UK, show that progress is possible. However, radical steps are required to achieve this. Such steps should be based on evidence not anecdotes. Health Research Policy and Systems (HARPS) provides a vehicle for the publication of research, and informed opinion, on a range of topics related to the organisation of health research systems and the enormous benefits that can be achieved. Following the Mexico ministerial summit on health research, WHO has been identifying ways in which it could itself improve the use of research evidence. The results from this activity are soon to be published as a series of articles in HARPS. This editorial provides an account of some of these recent key developments in health research systems but places them in the context of a distinguished tradition of debate about the role of science in society. It also identifies some of the main issues on which 'research on health research' has already been conducted and published, in some cases in HARPS. Finding and retaining adequate financial and human resources to conduct health research is a major problem, especially in low and middle income countries where the need is often greatest. Research ethics and agenda-setting that responds to the demands of the public are issues of growing concern. Innovative and collaborative ways are being found to organise the conduct and utilisation of research so as to inform policy, and improve health and health equity. This is crucial, not least to achieve the health-related Millennium Development Goals. But much more progress is needed. The editorial ends by listing a wide range of topics related to the above priorities on which we hope to feature further articles in HARPS and thus contribute to an informed debate on how best to achieve such progress.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.