Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17085800›Full record

ArticleClinical reviews in allergy & immunology

Concluding remarks: can we explain the association of beta-agonists with asthma mortality? A hypothesis.

Robert J Hancox

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Is overreliance on short-acting βERJ open research · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Vasculitis: current status and future directions.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2008
    Article
  11. Cutting edge issues in autoimmunity.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2008
    Article
  12. Whither autoimmunity: the lessons of anti-CCP and B cell depletion.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J HancoxDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand. bob.hancox@otago.ac.nz
Dunedin Public Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beta-agonists have clearly demonstrated benefits for the treatment of both acute and chronic asthma. Therefore, it is perhaps surprising that many of the articles in this issue have focused on concerns about their safety. Much of this concern can be traced back to the "beta-agonist controversy"--the association of high-dose isoprenaline and fenoterol inhalers with asthma mortality in the 1960s and 1970s. Although a causal link was never proven, lingering doubts about the safety of beta-agonists remain. It is unclear whether a similar adverse effect is responsible for recently reported association of long-acting beta-agonists with asthma deaths. No mechanism for the beta-agonist controversy was established, but the evidence presented in this collection of articles points to a number of contributing factors. I suggest that a combination of these effects provides a plausible mechanism for the association of frequent beta-agonist use with asthma mortality. Rebound bronchoconstriction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness occur on withdrawal of regular beta-agonist treatment. Regular use of fenoterol is associated with a reduction in morning peak flow suggesting that the overnight interval between doses is sufficient to allow rebound bronchoconstriction. This has not been observed with terbutaline or salbutamol, although rebound phenomena do occur when these drugs are withdrawn for slightly longer periods. Regular use of beta-agonists also leads to tolerance to their bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects. Tolerance becomes more apparent with worsening bronchoconstriction. In severe asthma, this could result in a poor response to emergency treatment. The combination of rebound deterioration of asthma and a poor response to beta-agonist treatment resulting from tolerance could explain the increased mortality associated with fenoterol and isoprenaline. Both effects are probably caused by downregulation of beta-receptors which occurs with all beta-agonists. Long-acing beta-agonists cause a similar degree of tolerance to short-acting beta-agonists, but avoid the problem of overnight withdrawal. Long-acting beta-agonists have also been shown to improve asthma control when taken in combination with inhaled corticosteroids. The clinical significance of tolerance in this context remains to be determined.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsCause of DeathDrug ToleranceHumansRecurrenceAdrenergic beta-AgonistsBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID17085800
OpenAlexW2040715190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.