Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17085791›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology

Beta2-agonists and exercise-induced asthma.

Sandra D Anderson, Corinne Caillaud, John D Brannan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beta₂-agonists for exercise-induced asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. An evaluation of levalbuterol HFA in the prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2007
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm and Allergy.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2017
    Review
  9. Exercise and asthma: an overview.European clinical respiratory journal · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Beta2-agonists for exercise-induced asthma.Paediatrics & child health · 2014
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Practical approach to exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2013
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Asthma outcomes: pulmonary physiology.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cutting edge issues in autoimmunity.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra D AndersonDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia. sandya@med.usyd.edu.au
Corinne Caillaud
John D Brannan
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beta2-agonists taken immediately before exercise provide significant protection against exercise- induced asthma (EIA) in most patients. However, when they are taken daily, there are some negative aspects regarding severity, control, and recovery from EIA. First, there is a significant minority (15-20%) of asthmatics whose EIA is not prevented by beta2-agonists, even when inhaled corticosteroids are used concomitantly. Second, with daily use, there is a decline in duration of the protective effect of long-acting beta2-agonists. Third, if breakthrough EIA occurs, recovery of lung function is slower in response to a beta2-agonist, and additional doses are often required to achieve pre-exercise values. If a person who takes a beta2-agonist daily experiences problems with exercise, then the physician should consider changing the treatment regimen to achieve better control of EIA. These problems likely result from desensitization of the beta2-receptor on the mast cell, which enhances mediator release, and on the bronchial smooth muscle, which enhances the bronchoconstrictor response and delays recovery from EIA. These effects are reversed within 72 h after cessation of a beta2-agonists. The important clinical question is: Are we actually compromising the beneficial effects of beta2-agonists on the prevention and recovery from EIA by prescribing them daily? Patients with EIA need to ensure that their doses of inhaled corticosteroid or other anti-inflammatory therapy are optimized so that, if necessary, a beta2-agonist can be used intermittently as prophylactic medication with greater confidence in the outcome.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsAsthma, Exercise-InducedDrug ToleranceHumansReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Adrenergic beta-AgonistsReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2

Identifiers

PMID17085791
OpenAlexW2008550143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.