Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17085789›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology

Regulation of mast cells by beta-agonists.

Peter Peachell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Research Advances in Mast Cell Biology and Their Translation Into Novel Therapies for Anaphylaxis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023
    Review
  4. Mast Cells in Upper and Lower Airway Diseases: Sentinels in the Front Line.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Nonrespiratory Comorbidities in Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The pathophysiology of anaphylaxis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Vasculitis: current status and future directions.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2008
    Article
  11. Cutting edge issues in autoimmunity.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2008
    Article
  12. Whither autoimmunity: the lessons of anti-CCP and B cell depletion.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2008
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Dermal immunopathology: from genetics to effector mechanisms.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2007
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter PeachellAcademic Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kindgom. p.t.peachell@shef.ac.uk
Royal Hallamshire Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human lung mast cell is known to be a critical effector cell in the mediation of asthma. Activation of the mast cell by allergens and other stimuli leads to the release and generation of a wide variety of autacoids that cause bronchoconstriction, promote inflammation, and may influence airway remodeling. Therefore, the stabilization of mast cells has obvious value in the prevention of asthma. Among the drugs used to treat asthma, only beta-agonists are effective stabilizers of mast cells. Both short- and long-acting beta-agonists are effective against mast cells, but there are differences between agonists regarding the extent of inhibitory activity attained. Consequently, the type of beta-agonist prescribed influences the degree of mast cell stabilization possible. Despite the potential value of attenuating mast cell activity with beta-agonists, this benefit may diminish with time because of the development of tolerance. Both short- and long-acting beta-agonists can induce tolerance to mast cell stabilization, and generally, higher efficacy agonists tend to induce greater levels of tolerance; however, weaker agonists induce greater levels of tolerance than might be expected. Tolerance to the mast-cell-stabilizing effects of beta- agonists may be an issue clinically, because this occurs more readily than tolerance to smooth muscle relaxation. This could lead to a situation in which beta-agonists fail to prevent the release of mediators from mast cells but can still effectively relax airway smooth muscle. The continued ability to bronchodilate could mask the unfavorable consequences of unchecked mediator release from mast cells.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsAsthmaDrug ToleranceHumansMast CellsAdrenergic beta-Agonists

Identifiers

PMID17085789
OpenAlexW2084982091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.