Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17082969›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2007

MDMA use and neurocognition: a meta-analytic review.

Ari D Kalechstein, Richard De La Garza, James J Mahoney, William E Fantegrossi, Thomas F Newton

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Mental disorders in childhood or adolescence and subsequent comprehensive school achievement.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Something is not nothing: Hair-tested substance use and cognitive functions in a large community sample of young adults.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Legal highs: staying on top of the flood of novel psychoactive substances.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ari D KalechsteinDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA. adk@ucla.edu
Richard De La Garza
James J Mahoney
William E Fantegrossi
Thomas F Newton

Funding

YNPRC NHP CLINICAL MEDICINE RESIDENCY PROGRAM - SUPPLEMENTP51RR000165 · NCRR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, JOHN DAVID · 1985 to 2011
$114.0M
UCLA DRUG ABUSE RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007272 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GRELLA, CHRISTINE E · 1991 to 2017
$4.9M
NCRR NIH HHS P51-RR000165NIDA NIH HHS DA00388NIDA NIH HHS DA07272NIDA NIH HHS DA50038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTo determine the association between MDMA misuse and neurocognition using meta-analysis.

objectiveSeparate analyses were conducted based on two sets of inclusion/exclusion criteria. A relatively stringent set required that the subjects be matched on important moderator variables, whereas the other did not. The study participants' performance in the following neurocognitive domains was reviewed: attention/concentration, verbal and nonverbal learning and memory, psychomotor speed and executive systems functioning.

resultsIn the 11 studies meeting the relatively stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria for this review, MDMA use was associated with neurocognitive deficits in each domain. Similarly, in the 23 studies meeting the relatively lenient inclusion/exclusion criteria for this review, MDMA use was associated with neurocognitive deficits in each domain. Small to medium effect sizes were generally observed. A comparison of the effect sizes across the two sets of analyses did not reveal significant differences.

conclusionsThe findings from this review reveal that MDMA use is associated with neurocognitive deficits. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Indexed as

Amphetamine-Related DisordersAttentionCognitionCognition DisordersHallucinogensHumansLearningMemoryN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineProblem SolvingPsychomotor PerformanceHallucinogensN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.