Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17082841›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2006

Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE.

Sharon S-L Wong, Nancy L Wilczynski, R Brian Haynes

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Calcium supplementation for people with overweight or obesity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Metformin monotherapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020 · on this map
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Denosumab compared to other treatments to prevent or treat osteoporosis in individuals at risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Pooled it
  16. Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Systematic review of safety in paediatric drug trials published in 2007.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012
    Pooled it
  20. Low vs Standard Pressures in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: a Systematic Review.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sharon S-L WongSchool of Nutrition, Faculty of Community Services, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3 Canada. sharonw@ryerson.ca
Nancy L Wilczynski
R Brian Haynes

Funding

CLINICAL SEARCH RETRIEVAL FROM FOUR ELECTRONIC DATABASESR01LM006866 · NLM · MCMASTER UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, R BRIAN · 2000 to 2007
$638k
NLM NIH HHS 5R01LM06866-04NLM NIH HHS R01 LM006866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Databases, BibliographicMEDLINEReview Literature as TopicInformation Storage and RetrievalMedical Subject Headings

Identifiers

PMID17082841
PMCPMC1629423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.