ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2006
The use of early and midpoint adenoma-carcinoma sequence biomarkers in prediction of neoplastic progression in patients with a history of colorectal neoplasia.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective markers for early diagnosis and prognosis of sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since significant neoplasia after initial colonoscopy is low, we conducted this pilot study to compare the predictive role for colorectal neoplasia recurrence of anti-DCC with that of Adnab-9 binding to colonic effluent of high-risk patients. DCC and Adnab-9 effluent ELISA were performed at baseline colonoscopies. The results of follow-up colonoscopies were reviewed. To ensure specificity, immunohistochemistry and Western blot was performed with anti-DCC and for Adnab-9 where optimal fixation times were also evaluated. Mean follow-up was 2.6 years. Of 21 patients, 6 of 10 who progressed to CRN and 2 of 11 who did not had a positive Adnab-9 ELISA result (P=0.08). Despite an initial good correlation with Adnab-9 ELISA results in a smaller dataset, we were unable to obtain consistent subsequent DCC immunohistochemistry or Western blot data using antibody from two different sources. However, the original dataset of Adnab-9 results was reproducible on repetition of the ELISA with a larger set of samples that included this initial dataset and optimal fixation time was 20 min. We conclude that Adnab-9 appears to be a promising prognostic marker for neoplasia in the high-risk population. Industry standards need to be developed for DCC monoclonal antibodies that may have similar utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.