Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17079501›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to voriconazole among 13,338 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Tested by clinical and laboratory standards institute-recommended broth microdilution methods.

M A Pfaller, S A Messer, L Boyken, C Rice, S Tendolkar, R J Hollis, D J Diekema

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antifungal Activity of the Essential Oil ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Resistance rates of non-Infection and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular identification andCurrent medical mycology · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Use of the VITEK 2 system to identify and test the antifungal susceptibility of clinically relevant yeast species.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Michael A. Pfaller, M.D.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M A PfallerMedical Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. michael-pfaller@uiowa.edu
S A Messer
L Boyken
C Rice
S Tendolkar
R J Hollis
D J Diekema
University of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical laboratories frequently face the problem of delayed availability of commercially prepared approved reagents for performing susceptibility testing of new antimicrobials. Although this problem is encountered more often with antibacterial agents, it is also an issue with antifungal agents. A current example is voriconazole, a new triazole antifungal with an expanded spectrum and potency against Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and other opportunistic fungal pathogens. The present study addresses the use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict the susceptibility of Candida spp. to voriconazole. Reference broth microdilution MIC results for 13,338 strains of Candida spp. isolated from more than 200 medical centers worldwide were used. Voriconazole MICs and interpretive categories (susceptible, < or =1 microg/ml; susceptible dose dependent, 2 microg/ml; resistant, > or =4 microg/ml) were compared with those of fluconazole by regression statistics and error rate bounding analyses. For all 13,338 isolates, the absolute categorical agreement was 91.6% (false susceptible or very major error [VME], 0.0%). Since voriconazole is 16- to 32-fold more potent than fluconazole, the performance of fluconazole as a surrogate marker for voriconazole susceptibility was improved by designating those isolates with fluconazole MICs of < or =32 microg/ml as being susceptible to voriconazole, resulting in a categorical agreement of 97% with 0.1% VME. Clinical laboratories performing antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole against Candida spp. can reliably use these results as surrogate markers until commercial FDA-approved voriconazole susceptibility tests become available.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalAntifungal AgentsCandidaFluconazoleHumansLaboratoriesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPredictive Value of TestsPyrimidinesReference StandardsTriazolesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsFluconazolePyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID17079501
PMCPMC1828974
OpenAlexW2148641130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.