Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17077405›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2006

Effect of televised, tobacco company-funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions, and behavior.

Melanie Wakefield, Yvonne Terry-McElrath, Sherry Emery, Henry Saffer, Frank J Chaloupka, Glen Szczypka, Brian Flay, Patrick M O'Malley, Lloyd D Johnston

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. The effect of smoking cues in antismoking advertisements on smoking urge and psychophysiological reactions.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2009
    Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Changing Health Beliefs about Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Multi-Ethnic Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melanie WakefieldCenter for Behavioral Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. melanie.wakefield@cancervic.org.au.
Yvonne Terry-McElrath
Sherry Emery
Henry Saffer
Frank J Chaloupka
Glen Szczypka
Brian Flay
Patrick M O'Malley
Lloyd D Johnston

Funding

Monitoring the Future: Drug Use & Lifestyles of American Youth (Supp1: Nicotine Pouch and E-cigarette Use Among US Adolescents: National Estimates of Brand Use and Flavor Preferences)R01DA001411 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Richard A Miech · 1985 to 2026
$144.9M
YOUTH SMOKING AND THE MEDIAR01CA086273 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WAKEFIELD, MELANIE A · 2000 to 2003
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA86273NCI NIH HHS R01 CA086273NIDA NIH HHS DA01411NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA001411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo relate exposure to televised youth smoking prevention advertising to youths' smoking beliefs, intentions, and behaviors.

methodsWe obtained commercial television ratings data from 75 US media markets to determine the average youth exposure to tobacco company youth-targeted and parent-targeted smoking prevention advertising. We merged these data with nationally representative school-based survey data (n = 103,172) gathered from 1999 to 2002. Multivariate regression models controlled for individual, geographic, and tobacco policy factors, and other televised antitobacco advertising.

resultsThere was little relation between exposure to tobacco company-sponsored, youth-targeted advertising and youth smoking outcomes. Among youths in grades 10 and 12, during the 4 months leading up to survey administration, each additional viewing of a tobacco company parent-targeted advertisement was, on average, associated with lower perceived harm of smoking (odds ratio [OR]=0.93; confidence interval [CI]=0.88, 0.98), stronger approval of smoking (OR=1.11; CI=1.03,1.20), stronger intentions to smoke in the future (OR=1.12; CI=1.04,1.21), and greater likelihood of having smoked in the past 30 days (OR=1.12; CI=1.04,1.19).

conclusionsExposure to tobacco company youth-targeted smoking prevention advertising generally had no beneficial outcomes for youths. Exposure to tobacco company parent-targeted advertising may have harmful effects on youth, especially among youths in grades 10 and 12.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAttitude to HealthMotivationSmoking PreventionSocial MarketingTobacco IndustryAdolescentAdvertisingFemaleGeographyHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsProgram EvaluationRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID17077405
PMCPMC1698148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.