Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17076885›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2006

Evaluation of the accuracy of serum MMP-9 as a test for colorectal cancer in a primary care population.

Sue Wilson, Michael J O Wakelam, Richard F D Hobbs, Angela V Ryan, Janet A Dunn, Val D Redman, Fiona Patrick, Lynne Colbourne, Ashley Martin, Tariq Ismail

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: their value as diagnostic and prognostic markers and therapeutic targets.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of serum proteomics to detect large colon adenomas.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2008
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sue WilsonDepartment of Primary Care and General Practice, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. s.wilson@bham.ac.uk
Michael J O Wakelam
Richard F D Hobbs
Angela V Ryan
Janet A Dunn
Val D Redman
Fiona Patrick
Lynne Colbourne
Ashley Martin
Tariq Ismail
University of Birmingham · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBCancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK A5103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBowel cancer is common and is a major cause of death. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials estimates that screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood (FOB) test reduces mortality from colorectal cancer by 16%. However, FOB testing has a low positive predictive value, with associated unnecessary cost, risk and anxiety from subsequent investigation, and is unacceptable to a proportion of the target population. Increased levels of an enzyme called matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) have been found to be associated with colorectal cancer, and this can be measured from a blood sample. Serum MMP-9 is potentially an accurate, low risk and cost-effective population screening tool. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of serum MMP-9 as a test for colorectal cancer in a primary care population. METHODS/

designPeople aged 50 to 69 years, who registered in participating general practices in the West Midlands Region, will be asked to complete a questionnaire that asks about symptoms. Respondents who describe any colorectal symptoms (except only abdominal bloating and/or anal symptoms) and are prepared to provide a blood sample for MMP9 estimation and undergo a colonoscopy (current gold standard investigation) will be recruited at GP based clinics by a research nurse. Those unfit for colonoscopy will be excluded. Colonoscopies will be undertaken in dedicated research clinics. The accuracy of MMP-9 will be assessed by comparing the MMP-9 level with the colonoscopy findings, and the combination of factors (e.g. symptoms and MMP-9 level) that best predict a diagnosis of malignancy (invasive disease or polyps) will be determined. DISCUSSION: Colorectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomas and there is a period for early detection by screening, but available tests have risks, are unacceptable to many, have high false positive rates or are expensive. This study will establish the potential of serum MMP-9 as a screening test for colorectal cancer. If it is confirmed as accurate and acceptable, this serum marker has the potential to assist with reducing the morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Middle AgedPrimary Health CareSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorMatrix Metalloproteinase 9

Identifiers

PMID17076885
PMCPMC1654179
OpenAlexW1727718281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.