Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17075702›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2006

CC chemokine receptor 2 is protective against noise-induced hair cell death: studies in CX3CR1(+/GFP) mice.

Nathan B Sautter, Elizabeth H Shick, Richard M Ransohoff, Israel F Charo, Keiko Hirose

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CXFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Inflammation associated with noise-induced hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Purinergic Signaling and Cochlear Injury-Targeting the Immune System?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Interactions between Macrophages and the Sensory Cells of the Inner Ear.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan B SautterHead and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Elizabeth H Shick
Richard M Ransohoff
Israel F Charo
Keiko Hirose
Cleveland Clinic · USGladstone Institutes · US

Funding

Mononuclear phagocyte activi in cochlea acoustic traumaK08DC005761 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HIROSE, KEIKO · 2003 to 2007
$837k
NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC005761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic trauma was recently shown to induce an inflammatory response in the ear characterized by rapid entry of macrophages in the spiral ligament. The current study seeks to elucidate the mechanisms involved in summoning macrophages to the cochlear lateral wall and the role macrophages play in noise-induced injury or repair. CCL2 and its primary receptor, CCR2, are the most widely validated effectors of monocyte chemotaxis in vivo. CCL2-/- and CCR2-/- mice have been used extensively in studies of monocyte activation in neuronal injury. However, the function of CCL2 and CCR2 in the cochlea has not been studied. The present study examines the role of CCL2 and CCR2 in acoustic injury. CCL2-/- and CCR2-/- mice on a CX3CR1(+/GFP) background were exposed to octave band noise (8-16 kHz) for 2 h to determine the effect of CCL2 and CCR2 on monocyte migration into the cochlea, threshold shift, and cell survival. We found that threshold shift was unchanged in the two knockout mouse strains when compared to the background strain (CX3CR1(+/GFP)). Surprisingly, we found that monocyte migration was also unchanged, despite the absence of CCL2 or CCR2. However, there was a dramatic increase in noise-induced hair cell death in the CCR2-/- strain. This observation suggests that CCR2, independent of CCL2, plays a protective role in the cochlea after noise, and neither ligand nor receptor is necessary for monocyte migration. Possible mechanisms of neuroprotection by CCR2 are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DeathCell SurvivalChemokine CCL2CochleaEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHair Cells, AuditoryHearing Loss, Noise-InducedMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, KnockoutReceptors, ChemokineReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionChemokine CCL2Receptors, Chemokine

Identifiers

PMID17075702
PMCPMC2504633
OpenAlexW2029444903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.