Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17073942›Full record

ArticleImmunology2007

Genetic profiling of dendritic cells exposed to live- or ultraviolet-irradiated Chlamydia muridarum reveals marked differences in CXC chemokine profiles.

Michelle L Zaharik, Tarun Nayar, Rick White, Caixia Ma, Bruce A Vallance, Nadine Straka, Xiaozhou Jiang, Jose Rey-Ladino, Caixia Shen, Robert C Brunham

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle L ZaharikUniversity of British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tarun Nayar
Rick White
Caixia Ma
Bruce A Vallance
Nadine Straka
Xiaozhou Jiang
Jose Rey-Ladino
Caixia Shen
Robert C Brunham
BC Centre for Disease Control · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CABC Children's Hospital · CAGenome British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is a major cause of sexually transmitted disease worldwide for which an effective vaccine is being actively pursued. Current vaccine efforts will be aided by elucidating the interaction between Chlamydia and dendritic cells (DCs). Protective immunity appears to develop slowly following natural infection in humans, and early vaccine trials using inactivated C. trachomatis resulted in partial, short-lived protection with possible enhanced inflammatory pathology during re-infection. Thus, immunity following natural infection with live chlamydia may differ fundamentally from immune responses induced by immunization with inactivated chlamydia. We explored this conjecture by studying the response of DCs exposed to either viable or inactivated [ultraviolet (UV) -irradiated] chlamydia elementary bodies (EBs; designated as Live-EB and UV-EB, respectively) using Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays. Thirty-one immunologically characterized genes were differentially expressed by DCs following exposure to Live-EB or UV-EB, including two glutamic acid-leucine-arginine cysteine-X-cysteine (ELR CXC) neutrophil chemoattractant chemokines, Cxcl1 (KC), and Cxcl2 (MIP-2). Up-regulation of these genes by Live-EB as compared to UV-EB was verified by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and increased chemokine secretion was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay both in vitro and in vivo. Immunofluorescence and fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of chlamydia-infected lung tissue confirmed that Live-EB but not UV-EB induced significant DC and neutrophil infiltration during infection. These observations demonstrate that the development of an antichlamydial immune response is dramatically influenced by chlamydial viability. This has implications as to why early inactivated chlamydial vaccines were ineffective and suggests that new vaccine design efforts may benefit from in vitro DC screening for ELR chemokine expression profiles.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesCells, CulturedChemokines, CXCChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia muridarumDendritic CellsFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPneumonia, BacterialReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesChemokines, CXCVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID17073942
PMCPMC2265850
OpenAlexW1993587272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.