ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2007
Contractile effects of adenosine, coronary flow and perfusion pressure in murine myocardium.
Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Persistent Coronary Vasomotor Tone During Myocardial Ischemia Occurs at the Capillary Level and May Involve Pericytes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Pharmacology of the Adenosine A3 Receptor in the Vasculature and Essential Hypertension.PloS one · 2016Article
- Differential effects of adenosine A2a and A2b receptors on cardiac contractility.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is mixed evidence adenosine receptors (ARs) may enhance myocardial contractility, although this remains contentious. We assessed inotropic actions of adenosine (50 muM) and selective AR activation with 100 nM N (6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; A(1)AR agonist), 25 nM 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl) phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS-21680; A(2A)AR agonist) and 100 nM 2-chloro-N (6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (Cl-IB-MECA; A(3)AR agonist) in mouse hearts perfused at constant pressure, constant flow, or conditions of stable flow and pressure (following maximal nitroprusside-mediated dilatation at constant flow). Adenosine and CGS-21680 significantly (although modestly) increased force in constant-pressure perfused hearts (</=10 mmHg elevations in systolic pressure), effects paralleled by coronary vasodilatation (</=10 ml min(-1) g(-1) elevations in flow). Neither CHA nor Cl-IB-MECA altered force or flow. With constant-flow perfusion, adenosine and CGS-21680 reduced systolic pressure in parallel with perfusion pressure. When changes in coronary flow and pressure were prevented, CGS-21680 failed to alter contractility. However, adenosine still enhanced systolic pressure up to 10 mmHg. Relations between flow, perfusion pressure and ventricular force evidence substantial Gregg effects in murine myocardium: systolic force increases transiently by approximately 1 mmHg ml(-1) min(-1) g(-1) rise in flow during the first minutes of hyperaemia and in a sustained manner (by approximately 1 mmHg mmHg(-1)) during altered perfusion pressure. These effects contribute to inotropism with AR agonism when flow/pressure is uncontrolled. In summary, we find no evidence of direct A(1) or A(3)AR-mediated inotropic responses in intact myocardium. Inotropic actions of A(2A)AR agonism appear entirely Gregg-related. Nonetheless, the endogenous agonist adenosine exerts a modest inotropic action independently of flow and perfusion pressure. The basis of this response remains to be identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.