ArticleDer Nervenarzt2006
[Innovative care models for treating psychosis].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevention of rehospitalization in schizophrenia: results of an integrated care project in Germany.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2009Trial
- [Treatment of chronic psychiatric disorders. Ethical and anthropological aspects].Der Nervenarzt · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is generally accepted that modern mental health care gives community treatment priority over partial or full inpatient treatment. The requirements for community treatment of severely ill and chronic psychiatric patients are complex and, together with financing by the different social insurance providers, may lead to a rather problematic fragmentation of health service supply. Schizophrenia is considered the most expensive mental illness in Germany. It is estimated that indirect costs (expressed in financial terms) are five times higher than the direct costs of treatment and care. Innovative concepts of psychosocial intervention show that case management and assertive community treatment reduce the hospitalisation rate and duration of inpatient treatment, enhance social integration, and find the approval of most patients. However, there is no empirical evidence supporting this "psychiatry with no beds". Consideration should be given to psychosocial interventions as an alternative to inpatient hospital treatment such as day hospital care, crisis houses, or acute home treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17072569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.