Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17069464›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2006

Recent assembly of an imprinted domain from non-imprinted components.

Robert W Rapkins, Tim Hore, Megan Smithwick, Eleanor Ager, Andrew J Pask, Marilyn B Renfree, Matthias Kohn, Horst Hameister, Robert D Nicholls, Janine E Deakin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Necdin: A purposive integrator of molecular interaction networks for mammalian neuron vitality.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2021
    Review
  5. Epigenetics in Prader-Willi Syndrome.Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The origin and evolution of genomic imprinting and viviparity in mammals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert W RapkinsAustralian Research Council Center for Kangaroo Genomics and Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Tim Hore
Megan Smithwick
Eleanor Ager
Andrew J Pask
Marilyn B Renfree
Matthias Kohn
Horst Hameister
Robert D Nicholls
Janine E Deakin
Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Australian Research Council · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversität Ulm · DEAustralian National University · AUChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USLa Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting, representing parent-specific expression of alleles at a locus, raises many questions about how--and especially why--epigenetic silencing of mammalian genes evolved. We present the first in-depth study of how a human imprinted domain evolved, analyzing a domain containing several imprinted genes that are involved in human disease. Using comparisons of orthologous genes in humans, marsupials, and the platypus, we discovered that the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome region on human Chromosome 15q was assembled only recently (105-180 million years ago). This imprinted domain arose after a region bearing UBE3A (Angelman syndrome) fused with an unlinked region bearing SNRPN (Prader-Willi syndrome), which had duplicated from the non-imprinted SNRPB/B'. This region independently acquired several retroposed gene copies and arrays of small nucleolar RNAs from different parts of the genome. In their original configurations, SNRPN and UBE3A are expressed from both alleles, implying that acquisition of imprinting occurred after their rearrangement and required the evolution of a control locus. Thus, the evolution of imprinting in viviparous mammals is ongoing.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsAutoantigensChromosome MappingChromosomes, MammalianGenome, HumanGenomic ImprintingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMarsupialiaMicePlatypusRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearSequence Analysis, DNASequence HomologysnRNP Core ProteinsAutoantigensRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearsnRNP Core ProteinsSNRPB protein, humanSnrpb protein, mouseSNRPN protein, humanUBE3A protein, humanUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID17069464
PMCPMC1626109
OpenAlexW2106909623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.