Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17067767›Full record

ArticleGene2007

Characterization of pre-insertion loci of de novo L1 insertions.

Stephen L Gasior, Graeme Preston, Dale J Hedges, Nicolas Gilbert, John V Moran, Prescott L Deininger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gene, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Profiling of LINE-1-Related Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Alu elements: know the SINEs.Genome biology · 2011
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen L GasiorTulane Cancer Center and Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center SL-66, 1430 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112, United States.
Graeme Preston
Dale J Hedges
Nicolas Gilbert
John V Moran
Prescott L Deininger
Tulane University · USInstitut de Génétique Humaine · FRUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

UNCOVERING THE MECHANISMS OF OSTEOSARCOMA METASTASIS SUPPRESSION BY MTBPP20RR020152 · NCRR · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI YOU, ZONGBING · 2004 to 2011
$17.0M
Gen. &Mol. Analysis of Human LINE-1 RetrotranspositionR01GM060518 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORAN, JOHN V. · 1999 to 2024
$4.8M
Sine RetrotranspositionR01GM045668 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI DEININGER, PRESCOTT L. · 1993 to 2014
$4.2M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020152NCRR NIH HHS P20RR020152NIGMS NIH HHS GM60518NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045668NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060518NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM45668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human Long Interspersed Element-1 (LINE-1) and the Short Interspersed Element (SINE) Alu comprise 28% of the human genome. They share the same L1-encoded endonuclease for insertion, which recognizes an A+T-rich sequence. Under a simple model of insertion distribution, this nucleotide preference would lead to the prediction that the populations of both elements would be biased towards A+T-rich regions. Genomic L1 elements do show an A+T-rich bias. In contrast, Alu is biased towards G+C-rich regions when compared to the genome average. Several analyses have demonstrated that relatively recent insertions of both elements show less G+C content bias relative to older elements. We have analyzed the repetitive element and G+C composition of more than 100 pre-insertion loci derived from de novo L1 insertions in cultured human cancer cells, which should represent an evolutionarily unbiased set of insertions. An A+T-rich bias is observed in the 50 bp flanking the endonuclease target site, consistent with the known target site for the L1 endonuclease. The L1, Alu, and G+C content of 20 kb of the de novo pre-insertion loci shows a different set of biases than that observed for fixed L1s in the human genome. In contrast to the insertion sites of genomic L1s, the de novo L1 pre-insertion loci are relatively L1-poor, Alu-rich and G+C neutral. Finally, a statistically significant cluster of de novo L1 insertions was localized in the vicinity of the c-myc gene. These results suggest that the initial insertion preference of L1, while A+T-rich in the initial vicinity of the break site, can be influenced by the broader content of the flanking genomic region and have implications for understanding the dynamics of L1 and Alu distributions in the human genome.

Indexed as

Long Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsAlu ElementsBase CompositionBase SequenceChromosome MappingDNAGenome, HumanHeLa CellsHumansModels, GeneticShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsDNA

Identifiers

PMID17067767
PMCPMC1850991
OpenAlexW1987875612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.