ArticleGene2007
Characterization of pre-insertion loci of de novo L1 insertions.
Article in Gene, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Profiling of LINE-1-Related Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Divergent genome evolution caused by regional variation in DNA gain and loss between human and mouse.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Similar Evolutionary Trajectories for Retrotransposon Accumulation in Mammals.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Heritable L1 retrotransposition in the mouse primordial germline and early embryo.Genome research · 2017Article
- Transcription coupled repair and biased insertion of human retrotransposon L1 in transcribed genes.Mobile DNA · 2017Article
- Article
- Dynamic silencing of somatic L1 retrotransposon insertions reflects the developmental and cellular contexts of their genomic integration.Mobile DNA · 2017Article
- L1 retrotransposition: The snap-velcro model and its consequences.Mobile genetic elements · 2014Article
- The specificity and flexibility of l1 reverse transcription priming at imperfect T-tracts.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- Characterization of L1 ORF1p self-interaction and cellular localization using a mammalian two-hybrid system.PloS one · 2013Article
- Article
- Rescuing Alu: recovery of new inserts shows LINE-1 preserves Alu activity through A-tail expansion.PLoS genetics · 2012Article
- Gene properties and chromatin state influence the accumulation of transposable elements in genes.PloS one · 2012Article
- Alu elements: know the SINEs.Genome biology · 2011Review
- Review
- Distributions of transposable elements reveal hazardous zones in mammalian introns.PLoS computational biology · 2011Article
- Restless genomes humans as a model organism for understanding host-retrotransposable element dynamics.Advances in genetics · 2011Review
- LINE-1 retrotransposons: mediators of somatic variation in neuronal genomes?Trends in neurosciences · 2010Article
- Article
- A comparative approach shows differences in patterns of numt insertion during hominoid evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The human Long Interspersed Element-1 (LINE-1) and the Short Interspersed Element (SINE) Alu comprise 28% of the human genome. They share the same L1-encoded endonuclease for insertion, which recognizes an A+T-rich sequence. Under a simple model of insertion distribution, this nucleotide preference would lead to the prediction that the populations of both elements would be biased towards A+T-rich regions. Genomic L1 elements do show an A+T-rich bias. In contrast, Alu is biased towards G+C-rich regions when compared to the genome average. Several analyses have demonstrated that relatively recent insertions of both elements show less G+C content bias relative to older elements. We have analyzed the repetitive element and G+C composition of more than 100 pre-insertion loci derived from de novo L1 insertions in cultured human cancer cells, which should represent an evolutionarily unbiased set of insertions. An A+T-rich bias is observed in the 50 bp flanking the endonuclease target site, consistent with the known target site for the L1 endonuclease. The L1, Alu, and G+C content of 20 kb of the de novo pre-insertion loci shows a different set of biases than that observed for fixed L1s in the human genome. In contrast to the insertion sites of genomic L1s, the de novo L1 pre-insertion loci are relatively L1-poor, Alu-rich and G+C neutral. Finally, a statistically significant cluster of de novo L1 insertions was localized in the vicinity of the c-myc gene. These results suggest that the initial insertion preference of L1, while A+T-rich in the initial vicinity of the break site, can be influenced by the broader content of the flanking genomic region and have implications for understanding the dynamics of L1 and Alu distributions in the human genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.