Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17066097›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2006

Gene therapy progress and prospects: Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

K Foster, H Foster, J G Dickson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The pharmacology of regenerative medicine.Pharmacological reviews · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Effective rescue of dystrophin improves cardiac function in dystrophin-deficient mice by a modified morpholino oligomer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K FosterCentre for Biomedical Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK.
H Foster
J G Dickson
Royal Holloway University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe muscle wasting disorder affecting 1/3500 male births. There is currently no effective treatment, but gene therapy approaches are offering viable avenues for treatment development. The last 10 years have seen the development of a number of strategies and tools for muscle gene therapy. However, the major hurdle has been the inability to deliver vectors at high enough efficiency via a systemic route. The last 2-3 years (reviewed here) have seen unrivalled progress in efficient systemic delivery of viral and non-viral gene transfer agents and antisense oligonucleotides. This progress, coupled with the successful completion of the first gene therapy clinical trial for DMD, has led to three more clinical trials planned for the immediate future.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDystrophinGenetic EngineeringGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHumansMaleMiceModels, AnimalMuscle, SkeletalMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneOligonucleotides, AntisenseDystrophinOligonucleotides, Antisense

Identifiers

PMID17066097
OpenAlexW2081357017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.