Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17065614›Full record

ArticleGenome research2006

ProtoBee: hierarchical classification and annotation of the honey bee proteome.

Noam Kaplan, Michal Linial

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ProtoBug: functional families from the complete proteomes of insects.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noam KaplanDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Life Science Institute, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Michal Linial
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently sequenced genome of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) has produced 10,157 predicted protein sequences, calling for a computational effort to extract biological insights from them. We have applied an unsupervised hierarchical protein-clustering method, which was previously used in the ProtoNet system, to nearly 200,000 proteins consisting of the predicted honey bee proteins, the SWISS-PROT protein database, and the complete set of proteins of the mouse (Mus musculus) and the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster). The hierarchy produced by this method has been entitled ProtoBee. In ProtoBee, the proteins are hierarchically organized into 18,936 separate tree hierarchies, each representing a protein functional family. By using the mouse and Drosophila complete proteomes as reference, we are able to highlight functional groups of putative gene-loss events, putative novel proteins of unique functionality, and bee-specific paralogs. We have studied some of the ProtoBee findings and suggest their biological relevance. Examples include novel opsin genes and intriguing nuclear matches of mitochondrial genes. The organization of bee sequences into functional clusters suggests a natural way of automatically inferring functional annotation. Following this notion, we were able to assign functional annotation to about 70% of the sequences. ProtoBee is available at http://www.protobee.cs.huji.ac.il.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProteomeAnimalsBeesDrosophila melanogasterGenome, InsectInsect ProteinsMiceRod OpsinsInsect ProteinsProteomeRod Opsins

Identifiers

PMID17065614
PMCPMC1626645
OpenAlexW2147346369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.