ArticleGenome research2006
ProtoBee: hierarchical classification and annotation of the honey bee proteome.
Article in Genome research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- KMD clustering: robust general-purpose clustering of biological data.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Pax6 in Collembola: Adaptive Evolution of Eye Regression.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Trends in genome dynamics among major orders of insects revealed through variations in protein families.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- ProtoBug: functional families from the complete proteomes of insects.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Article
- Characterization of the shrimp neuroparsin (MeNPLP): RNAi silencing resulted in inhibition of vitellogenesis.FEBS open bio · 2014Article
- Proteomic analysis of Apis cerana and Apis mellifera larvae fed with heterospecific royal jelly and by CSBV challenge.PloS one · 2014Article
- Functional inference by ProtoNet family tree: the uncharacterized proteome of Daphnia pulex.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Diversity in protein glycosylation among insect species.PloS one · 2011Article
- Evolution of insect proteomes: insights into synapse organization and synaptic vesicle life cycle.Genome biology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recently sequenced genome of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) has produced 10,157 predicted protein sequences, calling for a computational effort to extract biological insights from them. We have applied an unsupervised hierarchical protein-clustering method, which was previously used in the ProtoNet system, to nearly 200,000 proteins consisting of the predicted honey bee proteins, the SWISS-PROT protein database, and the complete set of proteins of the mouse (Mus musculus) and the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster). The hierarchy produced by this method has been entitled ProtoBee. In ProtoBee, the proteins are hierarchically organized into 18,936 separate tree hierarchies, each representing a protein functional family. By using the mouse and Drosophila complete proteomes as reference, we are able to highlight functional groups of putative gene-loss events, putative novel proteins of unique functionality, and bee-specific paralogs. We have studied some of the ProtoBee findings and suggest their biological relevance. Examples include novel opsin genes and intriguing nuclear matches of mitochondrial genes. The organization of bee sequences into functional clusters suggests a natural way of automatically inferring functional annotation. Following this notion, we were able to assign functional annotation to about 70% of the sequences. ProtoBee is available at http://www.protobee.cs.huji.ac.il.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.