Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17065607›Full record

ArticleGenome research2006

Patterns of conservation and change in honey bee developmental genes.

Peter K Dearden, Megan J Wilson, Lisha Sablan, Peter W Osborne, Melanie Havler, Euan McNaughton, Kiyoshi Kimura, Natalia V Milshina, Martin Hasselmann, Tanja Gempe and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Seeking Sense in the Hox Gene Cluster.Journal of developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Power ofFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. TheBiology open · 2019
    Article
  19. A homeotic shift late in development drives mimetic color variation in a bumble bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Peter K DeardenLaboratory for Evolution and Development, Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa-New Zealand. peter.dearden@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
Megan J Wilson
Lisha Sablan
Peter W Osborne
Melanie Havler
Euan McNaughton
Kiyoshi Kimura
Natalia V Milshina
Martin Hasselmann
Tanja Gempe
Morten Schioett
Susan J Brown
Christine G Elsik
Peter W H Holland
Tatsuhiko Kadowaki
Martin Beye
University of Otago · NZHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DETexas A&M University · USUniversity of Oxford · GBKansas State University · USNagoya University · JPNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JP

Funding

GENETIC CONTROL OF SEGMENTATIONR01HD029594 · NICHD · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, SUSAN J. · 1992 to 2011
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD029594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current insect genome sequencing projects provide an opportunity to extend studies of the evolution of developmental genes and pathways in insects. In this paper we examine the conservation and divergence of genes and developmental processes between Drosophila and the honey bee; two holometabolous insects whose lineages separated approximately 300 million years ago, by comparing the presence or absence of 308 Drosophila developmental genes in the honey bee. Through examination of the presence or absence of genes involved in conserved pathways (cell signaling, axis formation, segmentation and homeobox transcription factors), we find that the vast majority of genes are conserved. Some genes involved in these processes are, however, missing in the honey bee. We have also examined the orthology of Drosophila genes involved in processes that differ between the honey bee and Drosophila. Many of these genes are preserved in the honey bee despite the process in which they act in Drosophila being different or absent in the honey bee. Many of the missing genes in both situations appear to have arisen recently in the Drosophila lineage, have single known functions in Drosophila, and act early in developmental pathways, while those that are preserved have pleiotropic functions. An evolutionary interpretation of these data is that either genes with multiple functions in a common ancestor are more likely to be preserved in both insect lineages, or genes that are preserved throughout evolution are more likely to co-opt additional functions.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBeesBody PatterningConserved SequenceDosage Compensation, GeneticDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, HomeoboxGerm CellsInsect ProteinsMaleMeiosisInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17065607
PMCPMC1626639
OpenAlexW2123145399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.