ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2006
Validation of Roche LightCycler Epstein-Barr virus quantification reagents in a clinical laboratory setting.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contribution of the Epstein-Barr virus to the oncogenesis of mature T-cell lymphoproliferative neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Negative plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA nasopharyngeal carcinoma in an endemic region and its influence on liquid biopsy screening programmes.British journal of cancer · 2019Article
- EBV and human cancer.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2015Article
- Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions.World journal of virology · 2012Review
- Measurement of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load using a novel quantification standard containing two EBV DNA targets and SYBR Green I dye.Virology journal · 2010Article
- Using Epstein-Barr viral load assays to diagnose, monitor, and prevent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2010Review
- Systemic EBV+ T-cell lymphoma in elderly patients: comparison with children and young adult patients.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2008Article
- Laboratory assays for Epstein-Barr virus-related disease.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2008Review
- Evaluation of the Epstein-Barr virus R-gene quantification kit in whole blood with different extraction methods and PCR platforms.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2008Article
- Duplex realtime PCR method for Epstein-Barr virus and human DNA quantification: its application for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders detection.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with a wide range of benign and malignant diseases, including infectious mononucleosis, lymphoma, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Measurement of EBV viral load in plasma is increasingly used for rapid assessment of disease status. We evaluated the performance characteristics of an EBV polymerase chain reaction assay that uses commercial reagents and instruments from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN). DNA was extracted from plasma using a MagNaPure instrument, and viral load was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction on a LightCycler. Analyte-specific reagents included primers and hybridization probes targeting the EBV LMP2 gene and a spiked control sequence. Accuracy and reproducibility were established using DNA from three cell lines. The assay was sensitive to approximately 750 copies of EBV DNA per milliliter of plasma and was linear across at least four orders of magnitude. The assay detected EBV DNA in three of five samples from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, seven of nine infectious mononucleosis samples, and 34/34 samples from immunosuppressed patients with clinically significant EBV-related disease, whereas EBV DNA was undetectable in plasma from 21 individuals without EBV-related disease. In conclusion, this LightCycler EBV assay is rapid, sensitive, and linear for quantifying EBV viral load. The assay appears to be useful for measuring clinically significant EBV levels in immunodeficient patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.