Diagnostic genome profiling: unbiased whole genome or targeted analysis?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Microarrays as a diagnostic tool in prenatal screening strategies: ethical reflection.Human genetics · 2014
   Article
2. Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2011
   Article
3. Detection of pathogenic copy number variants in children with idiopathic intellectual disability using 500 K SNP array genomic hybridization.BMC genomics · 2009
   Article
4. Anaplastic thyroid cancer: molecular pathogenesis and emerging therapies.Endocrine-related cancer · 2009
   Review
5. Novel microdeletion syndromes detected by chromosome microarrays.Human genetics · 2008
   Review
6. Bacterial artificial chromosome-emulation oligonucleotide arrays for targeted clinical array-comparative genomic hybridization analyses.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2008
   Article
7. Targeted versus whole-genome array comparative genome hybridization: The Atlantic divide.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2007
   Article
8. Whole-genome array comparative genome hybridization: the preferred diagnostic choice in postnatal clinical cytogenetics.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2007
   Article
9. Diagnosing idiopathic learning disability: a cost-effectiveness analysis of microarray technology in the National Health Service of the United Kingdom.Genomic medicine · 2007
   Article
10. Diagnostic array comparative genomic hybridization: is it ready for prime time?The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2006
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Diagnostic array comparative genomic hybridization: is it ready for prime time?2006
• Comment on
  Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics.2006

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as