Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17062598›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006

Screening strategies for chronic kidney disease in the general population: follow-up of cross sectional health survey.

Stein I Hallan, Ketil Dahl, Cecilia M Oien, Diana C Grootendorst, Arne Aasberg, Jostein Holmen, Friedo W Dekker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 328 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stein I HallanDepartment of Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7006 Trondheim, Norway. stein.hallan@ntnu.no
Ketil Dahl
Cecilia M Oien
Diana C Grootendorst
Arne Aasberg
Jostein Holmen
Friedo W Dekker
St Olav's University Hospital · NOLeiden University Medical Center · NLNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo find an effective screening strategy for detecting patients with chronic kidney disease and to describe the natural course of the disease.

designEight year follow-up of a cross sectional health survey (the HUNT II study).

settingNord-Trøndelag County, Norway

participants65,604 people (70.6 % of all adults aged >or=20 in the county).

main outcome measuresIncident end stage renal disease (ESRD) and cardiovascular mortality monitored by individual linkage to central registries.

results3069/65,604 (4.7%) people had chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), so we would need to screen 20.6 people (95% confidence interval 20.0 to 21.2) to identify one case. Restriction of screening to those with hypertension, diabetes, or age >55 would identify 93.2% (92.4% to 94.0%) of patients with chronic kidney disease, with a number needed to screen of 8.7 (8.5 to 9.0). Restriction of screening according to guidelines of the United States kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (US KDOQI) gave similar results, but restriction according to the United Kingdom's chronic kidney disease guidelines detected only 60.9% (59.1% to 62.8%) of cases. Screening only people with previously known diabetes or hypertension detected 44.2% (42.7% to 45.7%) of all cases, with a number needed to screen of six. During the eight year follow-up only 38 of the 3069 people with chronic kidney disease progressed to end stage renal disease, and the risk was especially low in people without diabetes or hypertension, women, and those aged >or=70 or with a glomerular filtration rate 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at screening. In contrast, there was a high cardiovascular mortality: 3.5, 7.4, and 10.1 deaths per 100 person years among people with a glomerular filtration rate 45-59, 30-44, and <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively.

conclusionScreening people with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or age >55 was the most effective strategy to detect patients with chronic kidney disease, but the risk of end stage renal disease among those detected was low.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetic NephropathiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansHypertensionKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNorway

Identifiers

PMID17062598
PMCPMC1647344
OpenAlexW2127729473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.