Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17061094›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics2007

A limiting source of organic nitrogen induces specific transcriptional responses in the extraradical structures of the endomycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices.

Gilda Cappellazzo, Luisa Lanfranco, Paola Bonfante

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Substantial nitrogen acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic material has implications for N cycling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gilda CappellazzoDipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Università di Torino, Viale P.A. Mattioli 25, 10125 Torino, Italy.
Luisa Lanfranco
Paola Bonfante
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular bases of organic nitrogen (N) metabolism in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi remain so far largely unexplored. To isolate genes responsive to low versus high organic N concentrations, the techniques of suppressive subtractive hybridization (SSH) and reverse Northern dot blot were performed on extraradical structures of the AM fungus Glomus intraradices grown on carrot hairy roots. This approach allowed the identification of 32 up-regulated and 2 down-regulated genes following a 48-h treatment with 2 microM of an amino acid pool (leucine, alanine, asparagine, lysine, tyrosine). The expression profile of eight genes was further confirmed by semi-quantitative and real-time RT-PCR. The majority of the sequences showed no significant similarity to proteins in databases. The other responsive genes code for putative glyoxal oxidases, transcription factors, a subunit of the 20S proteasome, a protein kinase and a Ras protein. This novel set of data indicates that G. intraradices extraradical structures perceive organic N limitation in the surrounding environment leading to a response at transcriptional level and supports the role of N as signalling molecule in AM fungi.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalBlotting, NorthernDaucus carotaFungal ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingMycorrhizaeNitrogenPlant RootsSequence Analysis, DNATranscription, GeneticFungal ProteinsNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID17061094
OpenAlexW1974934403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.