Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17060930›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2006

Animal food intake and cooking methods in relation to endometrial cancer risk in Shanghai.

W-H Xu, Q Dai, Y-B Xiang, G-M Zhao, W Zheng, Y-T Gao, Z-X Ruan, J-R Cheng, X-O Shu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prospective study of dietary fat and risk of uterine leiomyomata.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2014
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

W-H XuDepartment of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, 2200/25 Xie Tu Road, Shanghai 200032, China.
Q Dai
Y-B Xiang
G-M Zhao
W Zheng
Y-T Gao
Z-X Ruan
J-R Cheng
X-O Shu
Shanghai Cancer Institute · CNVanderbilt University · USFudan University · CN

Funding

Soyfood, Gene Polymorphisms and Endometrial Cancer RiskR01CA092585 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2001 to 2010
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092585NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 92585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated animal food intake and cooking methods in relation to endometrial cancer risk in a population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China. A validated food frequency questionnaire was used to collect the usual dietary habits of 1204 cases and 1212 controls aged 30-69 years between 1997 and 2003. Statistical analyses were based on an unconditional logistic regression model adjusting for potential confounders. High intake of meat and fish was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer, with adjusted odds ratios for the highest vs the lowest quartile groups being 1.7 (95% confidence interval: 1.3-2.2) and 2.4 (1.8-3.1), respectively. The elevated risk was observed for all types of meat and fish intake. Intake of eggs and milk was not related to risk. Cooking methods and doneness levels for meat and fish were not associated with risk, nor did they modify the association with meat and fish consumption. Our study suggests that animal food consumption may play an important role in the aetiology of endometrial cancer, but cooking methods have minimal influence on risk among Chinese women.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesChinaCookingDietEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMeatMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID17060930
PMCPMC2360744
OpenAlexW2046681464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.