Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17060623›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Induction and repair of zinc-finger nuclease-targeted double-strand breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans somatic cells.

Jason Morton, M Wayne Davis, Erik M Jorgensen, Dana Carroll

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Various Aspects of a Gene Editing System-CRISPR-Cas9.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Profile of Dana Carroll.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Genome editing comes of age.Nature protocols · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason MortonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, 15 North Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
M Wayne Davis
Erik M Jorgensen
Dana Carroll
University of Utah · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007464 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRUNWALD, DAVID J., STANFIELD, GILLIAN · 1985 to 2020
$6.1M
Stimulating Gene Targeting with Zinc Finger NucleasesR01GM065173 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CARROLL, DANA · 2002 to 2004
$589k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 065173NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065173NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007464NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM 07464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zinc-finger nucleases are chimeric proteins consisting of engineered zinc-finger DNA-binding motifs attached to an endonuclease domain. These proteins can induce site-specific DNA double-strand breaks in genomic DNA, which are then substrates for cellular repair mechanisms. Here, we demonstrate that engineered zinc-finger nucleases function effectively in somatic cells of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Although gene-conversion events were indistinguishable from uncut DNA in our assay, nonhomologous end joining resulted in mutations at the target site. A synthetic target on an extrachromosomal array was targeted with a previously characterized nuclease, and an endogenous genomic sequence was targeted with a pair of specifically designed nucleases. In both cases, approximately 20% of the target sites were mutated after induction of the corresponding nucleases. Alterations in the extrachromosomal targets were largely products of end-filling and blunt ligation. By contrast, alterations in the chromosomal target were mostly deletions. We interpret these differences to reflect the abundance of homologous templates present in the extrachromosomal arrays versus the paucity of such templates for repair of chromosomal breaks. In addition, we find evidence for the involvement of error-prone DNA synthesis in both homologous and nonhomologous pathways of repair. DNA ligase IV is required for efficient end joining, particularly of blunt ends. In its absence, a secondary end-joining pathway relies more heavily on microhomologies in producing deletions.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAnimalsBase SequenceCaenorhabditis elegansDNA, HelminthDNA LigasesDNA RepairEndonucleasesGenome, HelminthGerm CellsMutationZinc FingersDNA, HelminthDNA LigasesEndonucleases

Identifiers

PMID17060623
PMCPMC1637589
OpenAlexW1997060995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.