Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17058154›Full record

ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2006

[Aortic stenosis].

W G Daniel, H Baumgartner, C Gohlke-Bärwolf, P Hanrath, D Horstkotte, K C Koch, A Mügge, H J Schäfers, F A Flachskampf

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Eight-year follow-up after prospectively randomized implantation of different mechanical aortic valves.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2008
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. [Anticoagulation after heart valve replacement].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2023
    Review
  4. Can postoperative mean transprosthetic pressure gradient predict survival after aortic valve replacement?Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Observational
  5. Cardiac stem cells in patients with heart disease.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Cardiac syncope : diagnosis and therapy].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2011
    Article
  9. Article
  10. [Disappearing borders between cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery: status quo].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010
    Article
  11. Review
  12. [Heart diseases in pregnancy].Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2008
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Durability of bioprosthetic cardiac valves.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

W G DanielMed. Klinik 2, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. werner.g.daniel@rzmail.uni-erlangen.de
H Baumgartner
C Gohlke-Bärwolf
P Hanrath
D Horstkotte
K C Koch
A Mügge
H J Schäfers
F A Flachskampf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisDiagnosis, DifferentialEchocardiographyHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansPrevalencePrognosisTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.