Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17056720›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonists are preferable to agonists for in vivo peptide receptor targeting of tumors.

Mihaela Ginj, Hanwen Zhang, Beatrice Waser, Renzo Cescato, Damian Wild, Xuejuan Wang, Judit Erchegyi, Jean Rivier, Helmut R Mäcke, Jean Claude Reubi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 206 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 494 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dosimetry and pharmacokinetics of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Trial
  3. A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Trial
  4. A prospective randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Trial
  5. A Randomized, Factorial Phase II Study to Determine the Optimal Dosing Regimen forJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  6. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety, Biodistribution, and Dosimetry ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  7. Comparison ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Trial
  8. Biodistribution and radiation dose estimates forEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Development of dual SSTRSC medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  12. Head-to-head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mihaela GinjDivision of Radiological Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Hanwen Zhang
Beatrice Waser
Renzo Cescato
Damian Wild
Xuejuan Wang
Judit Erchegyi
Jean Rivier
Helmut R Mäcke
Jean Claude Reubi
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Bern · CHSalk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Somatostatin Receptor-Selective Agonists and AntagonistsR01DK059953 · NIDDK · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI RIVIER, JEAN E · 2002 to 2006
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK059953NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK 59953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting neuroendocrine tumors expressing somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst) with radiolabeled somatostatin agonists is an established diagnostic and therapeutic approach in oncology. While agonists readily internalize into tumor cells, permitting accumulation of radioactivity, radiolabeled antagonists do not, and they have not been considered for tumor targeting. The macrocyclic chelator 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) was coupled to two potent somatostatin receptor-selective peptide antagonists [NH(2)-CO-c(DCys-Phe-Tyr-DAgl(8)(Me,2-naphthoyl)-Lys-Thr-Phe-Cys)-OH (sst(3)-ODN-8) and a sst(2)-selective antagonist (sst(2)-ANT)], for labeling with (111/nat)In. (111/nat)In-DOTA-sst(3)-ODN-8 and (111/nat)In-DOTA-[4-NO(2)-Phe-c(DCys-Tyr-DTrp-Lys-Thr-Cys)-DTyr-NH(2)] ((111/nat)In-DOTA-sst(2)-ANT) showed high sst(3)- and sst(2)-binding affinity, respectively. They did not trigger sst(3) or sst(2) internalization but prevented agonist-stimulated internalization. (111)In-DOTA-sst(3)-ODN-8 and (111)In-DOTA-sst(2)-ANT were injected intravenously into mice bearing sst(3)- and sst(2)-expressing tumors, and their biodistribution was monitored. In the sst(3)-expressing tumors, strong accumulation of (111)In-DOTA-sst(3)-ODN-8 was observed, peaking at 1 h with 60% injected radioactivity per gram of tissue and remaining at a high level for >72 h. Excess of sst(3)-ODN-8 blocked uptake. As a control, the potent agonist (111)In-DOTA-[1-Nal(3)]-octreotide, with strong sst(3)-binding and internalization properties showed a much lower and shorter-lasting uptake in sst(3)-expressing tumors. Similarly, (111)In-DOTA-sst(2)-ANT was injected into mice bearing sst(2)-expressing tumors. Tumor uptake was considerably higher than with the highly potent sst(2)-selective agonist (111)In-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-[Tyr(3),Thr(8)]-octreotide ((111)In-DTPA-TATE). Scatchard plots showed that antagonists labeled many more sites than agonists. Somatostatin antagonist radiotracers therefore are preferable over agonists for the in vivo targeting of sst(3)- or sst(2)-expressing tumors. Antagonist radioligands for other peptide receptors need to be evaluated in nuclear oncology as a result of this paradigm shift.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMiceMice, NudeMolecular StructureNeoplasmsRadioligand AssayReceptors, PeptideReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatinReceptors, PeptideReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID17056720
PMCPMC1618814
OpenAlexW2057064048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.