Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17054281›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Vaccines for preventing malaria (blood-stage).

P Graves, H Gelband

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Malaria: prevention in travellers.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Malaria: prevention in travellers.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  5. Vaccines for preventing malaria (pre-erythrocytic).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  6. Vaccines for preventing malaria (SPf66).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Vaccines against malaria.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P GravesEpiVec Consulting, 606 Kimberly Lane NE, Atlanta, GA 30306, USA. epivec@comcast.net
H Gelband
Resources For The Future · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA malaria vaccine is needed because of the heavy burden of mortality and morbidity due to this disease. This review describes the results of trials of blood (asexual)-stage vaccines. Several are under development, but only one (MSP/RESA, also known as Combination B) has been tested in randomized controlled trials.

objectivesTo assess the effect of blood-stage malaria vaccines in preventing infection, disease, and death. SEARCH STRATEGY: In March 2006, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 1), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and the Science Citation Index. We also searched conference proceedings and reference lists of articles, and contacted organizations and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing blood-stage vaccines (other than SPf66) against P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae, or P. ovale with placebo, control vaccine, or routine antimalarial control measures in people of any age receiving a challenge malaria infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Results for dichotomous data were expressed as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN

resultsFive trials of MSP/RESA vaccine with 217 participants were included; all five reported on safety, and two on efficacy. No severe or systemic adverse effects were reported at doses of 13 to 15 microg of each antigen (39 to 45 microg total). One small efficacy trial with 17 non-immune participants with blood-stage parasites showed no reduction or delay in parasite growth rates after artificial challenge. In the second efficacy trial in 120 children aged five to nine years in Papua New Guinea, episodes of clinical malaria were not reduced, but MSP/RESA significantly reduced parasite density only in children who had not been pretreated with an antimalarial drug (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine). Infections with the 3D7 parasite subtype of MSP2 (the variant included in the vaccine) were reduced (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.57; 719 participants) while those with the other main subtype, FC27, were not (720 participants). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe MSP/RESA (Combination B) vaccine shows promise as a way to reduce the severity of malaria episodes, but the effect of the vaccine is MSP2 variant-specific. Pretreatment for malaria during a vaccine trial makes the results difficult to interpret, particularly with the relatively small sample sizes of early trials. The results show that blood-stage vaccines may play a role and merit further development.

Indexed as

Antigens, ProtozoanHumansMalariaMalaria VaccinesMerozoitesProtozoan ProteinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaccines, CombinedAntigens, ProtozoanMalaria VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsVaccines, Combined

Identifiers

PMID17054281
PMCPMC6532641
OpenAlexW1867686270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.