Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17054280›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Vaccines for preventing malaria (pre-erythrocytic).

P Graves, H Gelband

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Malaria: prevention in travellers.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Malaria: prevention in travellers.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  5. Vaccines for preventing malaria (blood-stage).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  6. Vaccines for preventing malaria (SPf66).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Malaria vaccine: a future hope to curtail the global malaria burden.International journal of preventive medicine · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P GravesEpiVec Consulting, 606 Kimberly Lane NE, Atlanta, GA 30306, USA. epivec@comcast.net
H Gelband
Resources For The Future · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccines against all stages of the malaria parasite are in development, mainly for Plasmodium falciparum, which causes the most serious form of malaria. Pre-erythrocytic vaccines act to prevent or delay a malaria attack by attacking the sporozoite and liver stages before the parasite reaches the bloodstream.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccines against any type of human malaria. SEARCH STRATEGY: In March 2006, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 1), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and the Science Citation Index. We also searched conference proceedings and reference lists of articles, and contacted organizations and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing pre-erythrocytic vaccines with placebo, control vaccine, or routine antimalarial control measures in people of any age receiving an artificial challenge or natural exposure to malaria infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Results of meta-analyses were expressed as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using an intention-to-treat analysis. MAIN

resultsNine safety and efficacy trials, and two safety trials, with over 3000 participants were included. In semi-immune children, RTS,S vaccine reduced clinical episodes of malaria by 26% (95% CI 13% to 37%) and severe malaria by 58% (95% CI 15% to 79%) for up to 18 months. Prevalence of parasitaemia was also reduced by 26% (95% CI 11% to 38%) at six months after immunization. RTS,S also reduced clinical malaria episodes by 63% (95% CI 18% to 83%) in semi-immune adult men in the second year of follow up after a booster dose. No severe adverse events were judged to be related to RTS,S vaccine, although the frequencies of injection site pain, swelling, arm motion limitation, headache, and malaise were increased in the vaccine groups. There was no evidence for effect of the CS-NANP vaccines (307 participants, 3 trials), CS102 peptide vaccine (14 participants, 1 trial), or the ME-TRAP vaccine (372 participants, 1 trial). AUTHORS'

conclusionsRTS,S vaccine was effective in preventing a significant number of clinical malaria episodes, including good protection against severe malaria in children for 18 months. No severe adverse events were attributable to the vaccine. Progression of this vaccine towards licensing is justified while efforts to increase its efficacy continue. The other vaccines do not look promising and further research is a priority.

Indexed as

AdultAntigens, ProtozoanChildHumansMalariaMalaria VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsVaccines, DNAAntigens, Protozoancircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanMalaria VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID17054280
PMCPMC6532586
OpenAlexW1515661597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.