Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17054274›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Screening for prevention of optic nerve damage due to chronic open angle glaucoma.

S Hatt, R Wormald, J Burr

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for age-related visual problems in patients with stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Projected clinical outcomes of glaucoma screening in African American individuals.Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Glaucoma Screening: Is AI the Answer?Journal of current glaucoma practice
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S HattLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, International Centre for Eye Health, Keppel Street, London, UK.
R Wormald
J Burr
Cochrane · GBMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen angle glaucoma (OAG) is a primary, progressive optic neuropathy; the onset is without symptoms and progression occurs silently until the advanced stages of the disease, when it affects central vision. The blindness caused by OAG is irreversible. It has often been assumed to be a condition that fulfils the criteria for population screening, although this has not been supported by other in-depth non-systematic reviews. The focus of this review was to examine the evidence for the effectiveness of screening for OAG.

objectivesTo determine the impact of screening for OAG compared with opportunistic case findings or current referral practices on the prevalence of and the degree of optic nerve damage due to OAG in screened and unscreened populations. SEARCH STRATEGY: We included any randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating population-based screening programmes for OAG with a minimum one year follow up. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1950 to February 2006) and EMBASE (1988 to February 2006). We also searched the National Research Register (Issue 1, 2006) and Zetoc for grey literature (29 June 2006). There were no language or date restrictions in the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include RCTs, including cluster RCTs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the study abstracts identified by the electronic searches. We did not find any trials that met the inclusion criteria. MAIN

resultsAs no trials were identified, no formal analysis was performed. AUTHORS'

conclusionsOn the basis of current evidence, population-based screening for chronic OAG cannot be recommended, although much can be done to improve awareness and encourage at risk individuals to seek testing. In wealthy countries with equitable access to high quality eye care and health education, blindness from chronic OAG should become increasingly rare; much greater challenges face poor and emerging economies and countries where there are substantial health and wealth inequalities. Effectiveness of screening for OAG can be established only by high quality RCTs.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansOptic Nerve Diseases

Identifiers

PMID17054274
PMCPMC8407423
OpenAlexW1721912713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.