Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17054271›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine-device use.

D A Grimes, D Hubacher, L M Lopez, K F Schulz

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Single dose oral mefenamic acid for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. New developments in intrauterine device use: focus on the US.Open access journal of contraception · 2016
    Review
  11. Effect of Piroxicam on ART Outcome: A Pilot Study.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Role of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Gynecology.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D A GrimesFamily Health International, Clinical Research Department, PO Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27709, USA. dgrimes@fhi.org
D Hubacher
L M Lopez
K F Schulz
Family Health International 360 · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USTriangle · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeavy bleeding and pain are the most common reasons why women discontinue IUDs. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which inhibit prostaglandin synthesis, have been shown to be effective in reducing menstrual bleeding and pain in women without IUDs.

objectivesThis review summarizes all randomized controlled trials studying use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment of bleeding or pain associated with IUD use. Trials of prophylactic use of these drugs around the time of IUD insertion were also included. SEARCH STRATEGY: We performed searches of PubMed, CENTRAL, POPLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and CINAHL for relevant trials. We also wrote to the authors of all trials identified to seek other published or unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials in any language that tested one or more nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for treatment or prevention of bleeding or pain associated with IUD insertion or use. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently abstracted data from relevant trials, and we entered data into RevMan for analysis. MAIN

resultsWe found 15 trials from 10 countries; the total number of participants was 2702. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (naproxen, suprofen, mefenamic acid, ibuprofen, indomethacin, flufenamic acid, alclofenac, and diclofenac) were effective in reducing menstrual blood loss associated with IUD use. This held true for women with and without complaints of heavy bleeding. Similarly, these drugs were effective in reducing pain associated with IUD use. In contrast, prophylactic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs had mixed results; studies with ibuprofen found no effect on pain after insertion on IUD discontinuation. No important differences emerged in the one trial comparing the effect of different NSAIDs on bleeding. AUTHORS'

conclusionsNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce bleeding and pain associated with IUD use. NSAIDs should be considered first-line therapy; if NSAIDs are ineffective, tranexamic acid may be considered as second-line therapy. Prophylactic ibuprofen administration with the first six menses after insertion appears unwarranted.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansIntrauterine DevicesMenorrhagiaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID17054271
PMCPMC8996118
OpenAlexW1724691110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.