Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17054233›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Massage intervention for promoting mental and physical health in infants aged under six months.

A Underdown, J Barlow, V Chung, S Stewart-Brown

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Manipulative therapies for infantile colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. A review of nonsurgical treatment for the symptom of irritability in infants with GERD.Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Postnatal depression.BMJ clinical evidence · 2009
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The effects of massage therapy to induce sleep in infants born preterm.Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association · 2014
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Crying Infant.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2017
    Review
  14. Management of musculoskeletal dysfunction in infants.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Looking for new treatments of Infantile Colic.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2014
    Review
  17. Somatosensory processing in neurodevelopmental disorders.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2010
    Article
  18. Community-based interventions to optimize early childhood development in low resource settings.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A UnderdownWarwick Medical School, Institute of Education, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. angela@underdown5.freeserve.co.uk
J Barlow
V Chung
S Stewart-Brown
University of Warwick · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfant massage is increasingly being used in the community for low-risk babies and their primary care givers. Anecdotal claims suggest benefits for sleep, respiration, elimination and the reduction of colic and wind. Infant massage is also thought to reduce infant stress and promote positive parent-infant interaction.

objectivesThe aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of infant massage in promoting infant physical and mental health in population samples. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were undertaken of CENTRAL 2005 (Issue 3), MEDLINE (1970 to 2005), PsycINFO (1970 to 2005), CINAHL (1982 to 2005), EMBASE (1980 to 2005), and a number of other Western and Chinese databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies in which babies under the age of six months were randomised to an infant massage or a no-treatment control group, and utilising a standardised outcome measuring infant mental or physical development. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Weighted and standardised mean differences and 95% confidence intervals are presented. Where appropriate the results have been combined in a meta-analysis using a random effects model. MAIN

resultsTwenty-three studies were included in the review. One was a follow-up study and thirteen were included in a separate analysis due to concerns about the uniformly significant results and the lack of dropout. The results of nine studies providing primary data suggest that infant massage has no effect on growth, but provides some evidence suggestive of improved mother-infant interaction, sleep and relaxation, reduced crying and a beneficial impact on a number of hormones controlling stress. Results showing a significant impact on number of illnesses and clinic visits were limited to a study of Korean orphanage infants. There was no evidence of effects on cognitive and behavioural outcomes, infant attachment or temperament. The data from the 13 studies regarded to be at high risk of bias show uniformly significant benefits on growth, sleep, crying and bilirubin levels. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe only evidence of a significant impact of massage on growth was obtained from a group of studies regarded to be at high risk of bias. There was, however, some evidence of benefits on mother-infant interaction, sleeping and crying, and on hormones influencing stress levels. In the absence of evidence of harm, these findings may be sufficient to support the use of infant massage in the community, particularly in contexts where infant stimulation is poor. Further research is needed, however, before it will be possible to recommend universal provision.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentMassageTherapeutic TouchHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPhysical StimulationRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID17054233
OpenAlexW1577367104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.