SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Strategies for improving health care seeking for maternal and newborn illnesses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Global health action · 2016Pooled it
- Elective induction for pregnancies at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation and its impact on stillbirths: a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2011Pooled it
- Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2009Pooled it
- Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2012Trial
- Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial.PLoS medicine · 2012Trial
- Timing of birth for women with a twin pregnancy at term: a randomised controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2010Trial
- Usefulness and timing of the third-trimester ultrasound scan: a review of guidelines and underlying evidence.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Review
- Membrane Sweeping to Induce Labor in Post-term Pregnant Women: Success Rate and Outcomes.Cureus · 2023Article
- Labor induction information leaflets-Do women receive evidence-based information about the benefits and harms of labor induction?Frontiers in global women's health · 2022Article
- Observational
- To Study the Maternal and Neonatal Outcome in Postdated Women Undergoing Induction of Labour Versus Spontaneous Labour.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021Article
- Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour.SAGE open medicine · 2017Article
- Meconium Amniotic Fluid is Associated with Endomyometritis.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2016Article
- Baird-Pattinson Aetiological Classification and Phases of Delay Contributing to Stillbirths in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital.Journal of pregnancy · 2016Article
- Fetal mortality at and beyond term in singleton pregnancies in Baden-Wuerttemberg/Germany 2004-2009.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs a pregnancy continues beyond term the risks of babies dying inside the womb or in the immediate newborn period increase. Whether a policy of labour induction at a predetermined gestational age can reduce this increased risk is the subject of this review.
objectivesTo evaluate the benefits and harms of a policy of labour induction at term or post-term compared to awaiting spontaneous labour or later induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (June 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials conducted in women at or beyond term. The eligible trials were those comparing a policy of labour induction to a policy of awaiting spontaneous onset of labour. Trials comparing cervical ripening methods, membrane stripping/sweeping or nipple stimulation without any commitment to delivery within a certain time were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently evaluated potentially eligible trials and extracted data. Outcomes are analysed in two main categories: gestational age and cervix status. MAIN
resultsWe included 19 trials reporting on 7984 women. A policy of labour induction at 41 completed weeks or beyond was associated with fewer (all-cause) perinatal deaths (1/2986 versus 9/2953; relative risk (RR) 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.99). The risk difference is 0.00 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.00). If deaths due to congenital abnormality are excluded, no deaths remain in the labour induction group and seven deaths remain in the no-induction group. There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference in the risk of caesarean section (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.12; RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.31) for women induced at 41 and 42 completed weeks respectively. Women induced at 37 to 40 completed weeks were more likely to have a caesarean section with expectant management than those in the labour induction group (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99). There were fewer babies with meconium aspiration syndrome (41+: RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.68, four trials, 1325 women; 42+: RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.81, two trials, 388 women). AUTHORS'
conclusionsA policy of labour induction after 41 completed weeks or later compared to awaiting spontaneous labour either indefinitely or at least one week is associated with fewer perinatal deaths. However, the absolute risk is extremely small. Women should be appropriately counselled on both the relative and absolute risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17054226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.