Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17054192›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Monoaminergic agonists for acute traumatic brain injury.

R J Forsyth, B Jayamoni, T C Paine

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Traumatic brain injury: an overview of pathobiology with emphasis on military populations.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2010
    Review
  6. Emerging treatments for traumatic brain injury.Expert opinion on emerging drugs · 2009
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R J ForsythUniversity of Newcastle upon Tyne, School of Clinical Medical Sciences (Child Health), Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK. r.j.forsyth@newcastle.ac.uk
B Jayamoni
T C Paine
Newcastle University · GBNorth Tyneside General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there have been considerable gains in understanding the cascade of events that lead to secondary injury after traumatic brain injury (TBI), efforts to translate this understanding into new therapeutic, so-called neuroprotective approaches, have so far proven disappointing. As an alternative, there is growing interest in approaches to enhance brain repair after injury. Animal models suggest that agents enhancing monoaminergic (MA) transmission, particularly amphetamines, promote motor recovery from focal brain injury and it is proposed that this might represent a complementary means of therapeutic intervention in the later post-injury phase.

objectivesTo evaluate the evidence that MAs improve final outcome after TBI. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005), the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (to May 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2005), EMBASE (1980 to May 2005) and the Science Citation Index (1992 to June 2005). We contacted researchers and authors of published and unpublished trials. Searches were updated in May 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing the use of a MA (together with conventional non-pharmacological rehabilitative therapy) versus conventional non-pharmacological rehabilitative therapy alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened records, extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN

resultsAlthough there is a limited clinical literature addressing this topic, none of the studies identified fully met inclusion criteria for this review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAt present there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of MAs to promote recovery after TBI.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdrenergic alpha-AgonistsAmphetaminesBrain InjuriesHumansNorepinephrineAdrenergic alpha-AgonistsAmphetaminesNorepinephrine

Identifiers

PMID17054192
PMCPMC13591133
OpenAlexW1548938029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.